Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish publishers: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 07:22, 18 November 2005 editLazarKr (talk \| contribs)559 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:43, 18 November 2005 edit undoRachelBrown (talk \| contribs)1,406 edits →[]Next edit →
Line 41:		Line 41:
	** Of course there's an underlying intention in my case - to record the contributions of the Jewish people to civilisation. I'm not sure about the list of Jewish criminals, and maybe that should go. Otherwise, I'm just bewildered by the general hostility to these lists. I wonder about the underlying intention of this hostility, and how many well-meaning people are being taken in by it. - ] 21:35, 17 November 2005 (UTC)		** Of course there's an underlying intention in my case - to record the contributions of the Jewish people to civilisation. I'm not sure about the list of Jewish criminals, and maybe that should go. Otherwise, I'm just bewildered by the general hostility to these lists. I wonder about the underlying intention of this hostility, and how many well-meaning people are being taken in by it. - ] 21:35, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
	***The fact that you are willing to delete the list of criminals shows a bias for only keeping lists that show people in a good light, no? The point is that there are way too many of these lists, and for no reason, since 95% of the people listed in them can be easily found in other lists and categories. ] 23:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)		***The fact that you are willing to delete the list of criminals shows a bias for only keeping lists that show people in a good light, no? The point is that there are way too many of these lists, and for no reason, since 95% of the people listed in them can be easily found in other lists and categories. ] 23:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
			***-You've missed my point. Well-meaning but misguided people are voting for deletion of this list on the false assumption that its originator and editors had an ulterior anti-Semitic motive. I say that I don't believe that for this list or most other such lists; there ''may'' be such a motive for the list of criminals, but is there an AfD on it? - ] 10:43, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
	*Comment: listing only ''publishing houses'' that predominantly deal with ''Jewish subject matter'' would make sense. This list in its present form doesn't. Delete unless improved. ] 00:29, 18 November 2005 (UTC)		*Comment: listing only ''publishing houses'' that predominantly deal with ''Jewish subject matter'' would make sense. This list in its present form doesn't. Delete unless improved. ] 00:29, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
	----		----

Revision as of 10:43, 18 November 2005

List of Jewish publishers

Finishing incomplete nomination Nandesuka 11:48, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Delete One of the many spawnlings of listmania. There's a reason[REDACTED] does not have list of Muslim publishers, list of Atheist publishers, list of Buddhist publishers
Keep Yet another anonymous person seeking the deletion of a list of Jews. Why do people keep doing this? The arguments for keeping these lists have been well rehearsed in previous requests for deletion, and have always been accepted.
RachelBrown 22:03, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- No they haven't. See the yesterday's AFD on List of Jewish bankers. - Mgm| 12:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
  - They haven't yet been accepted for that article - Londoneye 09:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete Why do people continously make these ridiculously specifi lists when no other lists of the like are made? EscapeArtistsNeverDie 22:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Don't feed the conspiracy theorists. Nandesuka 23:15, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Can this be used for anything but anti-Semitic purposes? --Maru (talk) Contribs 23:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Sets bad precedent. Religion and profession are rarely related. Serves no useful purpose. - Mgm| 12:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete per arguments given above and at the List of Jewish bankers AfD. Anville 12:43, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete Trivial Carina22 12:44, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete per above. BDAbramson T 14:21, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- In last few months were deleted Lists of Jewish scientists, engineers and so on. An attempts were made to delete Lists of Jewish Fellows of Royal Society, historians and List of Jews. There are a lot of such Lists for various nationalities in Misplaced Pages.
- Mr. BDAbramson! Can you give us, as highly qualified attorney, a legal advice:
- Can Misplaced Pages Organisation indorse all this Delitions, if apparently the only reason for them is that Jews are ethnic,relious group and not nationality?
- LazarKr 07:20, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Categorize members of the list to Category:Publishers and Category:Jewish according to nationality, then delete the list, so no information is actually lost. ~~~~ 14:27, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Categorify and delete, per Freak. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 15:21, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete - more unnecessary listcruft (as in who gives a damn what religion these guys are?). I would have voted to keep if this had been an actual list of publishing houses that produce books in the language or about exclusively Jewish topics, but this list ain't it. 23skidoo 16:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete Lists of Jews have been deleted, not kept. See List of Jewish members of the French Academy of Sciences, List of Jewish members of the Russian Academy of Sciences... howcheng 17:34, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Note that others have been kept, such as Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/List of Jews itself. Not that I think this should survive myself. — Haeleth Talk
Delete or merge with list of deleted lists that tied various Jews to their occupations. Youngamerican 19:02, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Categorize and delete per Freakofnurture. — Haeleth Talk 21:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete no more encyclopedic than List of Methodist dentists. Durova 23:39, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Keep — if the contents are valid. — RJH 01:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Why on earth do we need to make lists of people by race/religion/ethnicity? Of what possible use is such a list is this? Is anyone ever going to type “List of Jewish publishers” into the search box? ♠DanMS 01:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- For some people, examples of accomplished individuals belonging to their shared faith is a significant source of pride and role models. This is just PC-ness run amuck. This type of information is going to be maintained somewhere, so why not do it here and make a proper, balanced, nPoV job of it? — RJH
  - This is not my reason for why I create religion involved lists. Otherwise I wouldn't hace created lists for religions where I have never even met anyone of the given faith. Religion is interesting to me as are religious people. I don't like reading in column form and by creating lists people can categorize them later. That said this might be too specific so I'm just not voting in this case.--T. Anthony 17:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. Jtmichcock 03:03, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete per MacGyverMagic. Turnstep 03:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Keep LazarKr 07:35, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Keep - Do we really want to adopt the French position of refusing to keep statistics by ethnicity? Look where it's got them. - Londoneye 09:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete as per all the foregoing. → Ξxtreme Unction {ł_blah} 12:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Keep Jews can regard themselves as a nation so, if French publishers, American publishers etc. are allowed this should be also. Arniep 12:26, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Keep I abhor the attitude that Jews aren't allowed the same self-identity as anyone else. - Poetlister 12:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Keep Astrokey44 13:59, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete If there were lists of this detail for other "ethnicities," I'd consider keeping --- but I sense some underlying intentions with these lists. Antidote 17:59, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Of course there's an underlying intention in my case - to record the contributions of the Jewish people to civilisation. I'm not sure about the list of Jewish criminals, and maybe that should go. Otherwise, I'm just bewildered by the general hostility to these lists. I wonder about the underlying intention of this hostility, and how many well-meaning people are being taken in by it. - RachelBrown 21:35, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
  - The fact that you are willing to delete the list of criminals shows a bias for only keeping lists that show people in a good light, no? The point is that there are way too many of these lists, and for no reason, since 95% of the people listed in them can be easily found in other lists and categories. 65.9.143.76 23:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
  - -You've missed my point. Well-meaning but misguided people are voting for deletion of this list on the false assumption that its originator and editors had an ulterior anti-Semitic motive. I say that I don't believe that for this list or most other such lists; there may be such a motive for the list of criminals, but is there an AfD on it? - RachelBrown 10:43, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
Comment: listing only publishing houses that predominantly deal with Jewish subject matter would make sense. This list in its present form doesn't. Delete unless improved. Pilatus 00:29, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

STRONG KEEP

All Lists are nominated by Arniep. see .

All biographical encyclopedia, "Who's Who", "Persoenlichkeiten" are nominated. It's so crazy.

「努力を尽くした人名一覧（人名百科事典）が、一人の人物によって、すべて削除されようとしている」!! --User:Sheynhertz-Unbayg/sig 03:06, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

p.s. to first person: Judaism (yahaduth) is not only religion, and Jews is not only ethnic people. see mitzvah, taryag and halakha etc. --User:Sheynhertz-Unbayg/sig 03:06, 18 November 2005 (UTC)