Revision as of 13:18, 2 May 2009 editTFOWR (talk | contribs)27,123 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:18, 2 May 2009 edit undoSPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs)30,768 edits BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified)Next edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{SPIcat}} | {{SPIcat}} | ||
;Suspected sockpuppets <!-- BOTDONE_USER_NOTICE DO_NOT_MODIFY ]] (THIS CURRENTLY IS NOT ACTIVE, this comment is for testing only) --> | |||
;Suspected sockpuppets | |||
* {{checkuser|1=Lovetolovecraig}} | * {{checkuser|1=Lovetolovecraig}} | ||
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> | <!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> |
Revision as of 13:18, 2 May 2009
Nimbley6
Nimbley6 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Nimbley6/Archive.
Report date May 2 2009, 13:18 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Lovetolovecraig (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Evidence submitted by This flag once was reddeeds
- Recently I've been going straight to WP:ANI with Nimbley6's socks, however I'm not convinced that this editor necessarily passes the WP:DUCK-test. Feel free to WP:TROUT me and send me onwards to WP:ANI ;-)
- Nimbley6 is a serial sock puppeteer, with a fascination for Scotland and Scottish topics, particularly musicians and bands. Typically Nimbley6 will use dynamic IP addresses, but does occasionally create registered usernames. Typical behaviour includes creating articles (often within a sock's first few edits), adding images to articles (the images will frequently, as is the case here, be blatant copyvios or breaches of fair-use, and a WP:POINTy obsession with the primacy of Scotland over the UK.
- I believe Lovetolovecraig is another Nimbley6 sock, however this editor has been editing for nearly a week now and - while I have been monitoring their edits for all that time - their behaviour has been less obviously Nimbley6-ish than past socks. I am therefore concerned about jumping to conclusions and simply requesting a block on WP:ANI - for that reason I feel a checkuser, or at least a second pair of eyes, is appropriate.
Cheers, This flag once was reddeeds 13:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
- CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by This flag once was reddeeds 13:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Conclusions
Categories: