| Revision as of 12:20, 8 May 2009 editSocrates2008 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers20,592 edits Question← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:42, 8 May 2009 edit undoCheckeroffacts (talk | contribs)80 edits →Haseldine-specific editing: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ==Haseldine-specific editing== | ==Haseldine-specific editing== | ||
| May I ask why all your edits are limited specifically to ] and associated articles? <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva"><font color="black"><font size="4">Socrates2008 (<font size=3>]</font>)</font></font></font> 12:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC) | May I ask why all your edits are limited specifically to ] and associated articles? <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva"><font color="black"><font size="4">Socrates2008 (<font size=3>]</font>)</font></font></font> 12:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :Of course, though I choose not to reply! ] are not considered inherently legitimate, but I do hope you will alert me if a single edit is in any way inapppropriate? ] (]) 19:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:42, 8 May 2009
Haseldine article
FYI, he was quoting Dukakis in calling South Africa a "terrorist state" - see the last sentence in his letter (the image) in the Patrick Haseldine article where he specifically refers to this. Socrates2008 (Talk) 23:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Quite right - missed that. Apologies. Checkeroffacts (talk) 06:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- This is the reference that Socrates2008 is referring to: Dukakis Backers Agree Platform Will Call South Africa 'Terrorist'. The image in question is here and your vote following the IfD discussion would be appreciated here.PJHaseldine (talk) 21:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Haseldine at St Ignatius College
Sorry about not spotting that that was a mirror - it has just the introduction of a very old revision of the Patrick Haseldine article... Dark-Fire (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Haseldine-specific editing
May I ask why all your edits are limited specifically to Patrick Haseldine and associated articles? Socrates2008 (Talk) 12:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Of course, though I choose not to reply! single purpose accounts are not considered inherently legitimate, but I do hope you will alert me if a single edit is in any way inapppropriate? Checkeroffacts (talk) 19:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)