| Revision as of 03:42, 7 May 2009 editQuasirandom (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,995 edits →Hoshino Fuuta: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:43, 12 May 2009 edit undoVondell (talk | contribs)11 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''Delete''' I'm going to trust Nihonjoe on the search for reliable sources. ] pretty much comes into play here, which requires all content be cited to a ] and there is no evidence that this individual passes ], specifically ]. --''']''' (]) 11:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' I'm going to trust Nihonjoe on the search for reliable sources. ] pretty much comes into play here, which requires all content be cited to a ] and there is no evidence that this individual passes ], specifically ]. --''']''' (]) 11:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :* Well, it's not hard to find at least some of the listed works and confirm that "Hoshino Fuuta" is listed as the author, at least by sellers. Which is not the ideal in sourcing, but can be treated as reliable pending finding a better. That would take care of the BLP concerns. The problem of notability, either under ] or ], remains however. —] (]) 03:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC) | :* Well, it's not hard to find at least some of the listed works and confirm that "Hoshino Fuuta" is listed as the author, at least by sellers. Which is not the ideal in sourcing, but can be treated as reliable pending finding a better. That would take care of the BLP concerns. The problem of notability, either under ] or ], remains however. —] (]) 03:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''LISTEN UP TROUT BOY''' I don't like that kind of behaviour get out of my face buddy. Plus unless you got reliable sources, more than just a list of publication, then it's not blp. I tried to find sources and failed. You want me to write it out? you want me to come round your house and stab you in the face?? '''delete''' ] (]) 14:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:43, 12 May 2009
Hoshino Fuuta
- Hoshino Fuuta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not meat notability guidelines. Unreferenced BLP. Vondell (talk) 12:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Congratulations, you have been slapped with a wet trout. Nominations for deletions should indicate how the nominator tried to find sources to address the issue before nominating the page per WP:BEFORE. - Mgm| 08:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: The artist apparently won an honorable mention in the Alice Club category in 1998 the 1st Core Magazine Awards (according to the Japanese article). That's the only thing of note I can find, and it's not enough to meet even the general notability guidelines. ···日本穣 10:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep: I don't know anything about this artist, but giving it the benefit of the doubt, since the shotacon/lolicon genres & communities are somewhat niche and underground, it may be hard for artists in those genres to be notable in the traditional/standard ways. But if people who read stuff from that genre think he's a big name in the field, then I think it should be considered notable enough, standard guidelines be damned... they're the ones who would know. Anyone familiar with the subject care to chime in? LordAmeth (talk) 10:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- How can we know that people think he is big name in the field? We need a reliable source for such a claim. Otherwise, it is a violation of WP:BLP. --Farix (Talk) 11:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I'm going to trust Nihonjoe on the search for reliable sources. WP:BLP pretty much comes into play here, which requires all content be cited to a reliable source and there is no evidence that this individual passes WP:BIO, specifically WP:CREATIVE. --Farix (Talk) 11:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it's not hard to find at least some of the listed works and confirm that "Hoshino Fuuta" is listed as the author, at least by sellers. Which is not the ideal in sourcing, but can be treated as reliable pending finding a better. That would take care of the BLP concerns. The problem of notability, either under WP:CREATIVE or WP:BIO, remains however. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- LISTEN UP TROUT BOY I don't like that kind of behaviour get out of my face buddy. Plus unless you got reliable sources, more than just a list of publication, then it's not blp. I tried to find sources and failed. You want me to write it out? you want me to come round your house and stab you in the face?? delete Vondell (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)