Revision as of 17:41, 15 May 2009 editAoi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,918 edits tsk tsk← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:56, 15 May 2009 edit undoJeneral28 (talk | contribs)1,258 edits →Examples of using "most successful single" or "highest charting single" in music articlesNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Regarding ], you stated you need help to make sure the article stays. I think that's what I just did... --Blanchardb-<small><sup>]•]•]</sup></small>-timed 13:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC) | Regarding ], you stated you need help to make sure the article stays. I think that's what I just did... --Blanchardb-<small><sup>]•]•]</sup></small>-timed 13:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Examples of using "most successful single" or "highest charting single" in music articles == | |||
...and yet, there are so many artists that '''do''' use this type of language in their articles. I found these by just clicking links off the Now! series articles. In fact, many of these are high-traffic articles about Billboard Hot 100 number 1 hits. | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
So, I fail to see your logic and why you insist on using an edit war to keep a similar statement out of an article. ] (]) 17:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:56, 15 May 2009
Regarding Tony Spinner, you stated you need help to make sure the article stays. I think that's what I just did... --Blanchardb--timed 13:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)