| Revision as of 19:47, 17 June 2005 edit12.144.5.2 (talk) Quest for proper NPOV correction← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:00, 23 November 2005 edit undoUser2004 (talk | contribs)23,415 edits SourcesNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ==NPOV Needed== | ==NPOV Needed== | ||
| The statement that Witness Lee "experienced salvation" is of course not NPOV.Did he convert to Christianity at this point,or (already a nominal Christian) have a "born-again experience"?Either would be preferable.--Louis E./le@put.com/] 19:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) | The statement that Witness Lee "experienced salvation" is of course not NPOV.Did he convert to Christianity at this point,or (already a nominal Christian) have a "born-again experience"?Either would be preferable.--Louis E./le@put.com/] 19:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == Sources == | |||
| I've reverted the addition of extensive criticisms because they are not sourced. Particlularly when we aqre making allegation of sexual and financial improprieties we need to have verifiable sources that we can attribute the allegations to. I can't find them in the listed sources. -] 22:00, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:00, 23 November 2005
Whatever "Administer"'s views might be about Witness Lee, please discuss factual (verifiable) issues in these pages. If you question the neutrality of the article, please state your reasons so we can discuss them. Cokoli 02:25, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
Facts
The editor of the article said to "discuss factual (verifiable) issues in these pages." Please do not write libelous material.
This article fails to explain such basic aspects as Mr. Lee's title, i.e. "Witness". In fact it sounds like an article written by people so familiar with the subjects that they are not aware something might have been assumed.
NPOV Needed
The statement that Witness Lee "experienced salvation" is of course not NPOV.Did he convert to Christianity at this point,or (already a nominal Christian) have a "born-again experience"?Either would be preferable.--Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 19:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Sources
I've reverted the addition of extensive criticisms because they are not sourced. Particlularly when we aqre making allegation of sexual and financial improprieties we need to have verifiable sources that we can attribute the allegations to. I can't find them in the listed sources. -Willmcw 22:00, 23 November 2005 (UTC)