| Revision as of 01:34, 24 November 2005 editPerfecto (talk | contribs)4,584 edits →not neutral: Java centric.: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:07, 24 November 2005 edit undoP-42 (talk | contribs)2 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ] 13:13, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | ] 13:13, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :I find no point-of-view asserted here. Please see ] regarding the use of the <nowiki>{{NPOV}}</nowiki> tag. If it being Java centric is concerned, then I invite you to expand the article to cover portals made in other languages. Thanks! -- ] ] 01:34, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | :I find no point-of-view asserted here. Please see ] regarding the use of the <nowiki>{{NPOV}}</nowiki> tag. If it being Java centric is concerned, then I invite you to expand the article to cover portals made in other languages. Thanks! -- ] ] 01:34, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ::If the no point-of-view policy is about unbiased articles, then your correction is not good. The article is biased towards only one technology, implying that a web portal can only be made from Java technologies. The article should be language neutral in defining what a portal is. I will take you up on your invitation and see if I can write something acceptable. I know it is not an easy thing. I will see about it over the weekend.-- ] 13:07, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:07, 24 November 2005
As someone who is shopping for, and consequently bewildered by, web portal software on the less than corporate enterprise level, I find this article inadequate in that it does not address this wide array of software that is out there, nor is there a link or disambiguation to these other forms (soopportal.org, web wiz forums, maxwebportal extreme, etc) of web portal. I would glady do an article myself, but clearly I'm not ready. I, and I suspect others, need someone more knowledgeable to at least start the ball rolling here. Please? Thanx. :-)Natcolley 18:54, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
not neutral: Java centric.
This is a well writen article but it is Java centric. What a web portal is should not be defined by the implementation of a portal in Java. I love Java but mentions of it should be in a links section or an example section. Peter 13:13, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- I find no point-of-view asserted here. Please see Misplaced Pages:NPOV regarding the use of the {{NPOV}} tag. If it being Java centric is concerned, then I invite you to expand the article to cover portals made in other languages. Thanks! -- Perfecto
01:34, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- If the no point-of-view policy is about unbiased articles, then your correction is not good. The article is biased towards only one technology, implying that a web portal can only be made from Java technologies. The article should be language neutral in defining what a portal is. I will take you up on your invitation and see if I can write something acceptable. I know it is not an easy thing. I will see about it over the weekend.-- Peter 13:07, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
