Revision as of 00:24, 23 May 2009 editJ Greb (talk | contribs)89,090 edits delsort← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:41, 23 May 2009 edit undoDream Focus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,009 edits its a keeperNext edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—] (]) 00:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—] (]) 00:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
*'''Keep''' Nothing wrong with plot summaries, that's how every book article is anyway. The story was notable enough to be reprinted in a hardcover book, along with other notable tales. The comic and the hardcover reprint are reviewed by third party media sources, such as IGN. ]''' 22:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:41, 23 May 2009
Flashbacks (comics)
- Flashbacks (comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article focuses on a single issue of Amazing Spider-Man, and is mainly a plot summary. I don't think this one issue is important enough to warrant its own article. Sandor Clegane (talk) 23:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete There doesn't even appear to be any attempt to come up with even a half-assed attempt at claiming it's notable. DreamGuy (talk) 23:09, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete In universe, no sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 23:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —J Greb (talk) 00:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing wrong with plot summaries, that's how every book article is anyway. The story was notable enough to be reprinted in a hardcover book, along with other notable tales. The comic and the hardcover reprint are reviewed by third party media sources, such as IGN. Dream Focus 22:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC)