| Revision as of 08:32, 24 October 2005 editDaGizza (talk | contribs)Administrators34,676 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:52, 25 November 2005 edit undoSethie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,043 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :What do you mean, that makes no sense. When people are looking for Dakshayani or Parvati, they are looking for the same goddess, until you have some strange sort of Hindu cult. {{DaGizza/Sg}} 08:32, 24 October 2005 (UTC) | :What do you mean, that makes no sense. When people are looking for Dakshayani or Parvati, they are looking for the same goddess, until you have some strange sort of Hindu cult. {{DaGizza/Sg}} 08:32, 24 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| I predict that anyone who knows anything about Hindusism would reccomend that the two be merged. Personally, I believe the best course of action is to just change the Dakshayani page to Parvati! ] 18:52, 25 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:52, 25 November 2005
Dakshayani should be merged into this article. Parvati is the most common name. Imc 10:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- Good idea, unfortunately there are many hinduism pages on wikipedia that should only be one. Before there was Shiva and Mahadeva, and there are many more to still be merged. Template:DaGizza/Sg 10:42, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
no....because.......other ppl might look for parvati
- What do you mean, that makes no sense. When people are looking for Dakshayani or Parvati, they are looking for the same goddess, until you have some strange sort of Hindu cult. Template:DaGizza/Sg 08:32, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
I predict that anyone who knows anything about Hindusism would reccomend that the two be merged. Personally, I believe the best course of action is to just change the Dakshayani page to Parvati! Sethie 18:52, 25 November 2005 (UTC)