User talk:TenPoundHammer: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:49, 26 May 2009 editBalloonman (talk \| contribs)25,417 edits →Total licensing: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:30, 26 May 2009 edit undoTheserialcomma (talk \| contribs)3,804 edits Internet Relay Chat floodNext edit →
Line 292:		Line 292:

	Thanks for putting the boxes around that... I got momentarily distracted at work.---''']''' '']'' 18:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)		Thanks for putting the boxes around that... I got momentarily distracted at work.---''']''' '']'' 18:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

			== Internet Relay Chat flood ==
			recently you withdraw your afd nom for ] because "sources" were added. but really, they weren't. there are just a bunch of references now, that aren't sources. it looks like fluff, and the article is terribly written. are you sure that it's worthy of remaining? ] (]) 21:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:30, 26 May 2009

Template:Archive box collapsible Thanks to Avruch for finally setting up an archive bot once I hit 11 archives!

Click here to leave me a message.

Swap. My help for your advice!

TPH, I was wondering if I could offer you a swap? You point me in the direction of a new Country stub you need, and you can help me with an odd problem I have? I'll assume you say yes and write about my problem!

Puebla F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is a perfectly normal looking page, I'm not sure how I came across it, but I did. An editor was having a problem with an IP editor who keeps adding a whole chunk of information (doubles the page size from 13ish kb to 30+ kb) which is unsourced and poorly written, but could well be correct and useful. I've been watching the page for a few days now and seem to have taken over from the previous editor in reverting the additions, on the basis they are unsourced and might be OR. I have posted numerous messages on the IP's talk page 76.235.130.49 (talk · contribs) but can't get a response, and an RfC on the talk page has drawn zero attention. What steps should I take from here to look after this article, encourage the IP editor to play the wp game and generally make the place a bit nicer?! TIA, Bigger digger (talk) 23:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Following your assistance I've picked out an article and looked up some sources. Could you have a look at Talk:Billy Gilman#Sources and briefly comment on their suitability? Cheers, Bigger digger (talk) 21:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Make It Home

The information actually was in the link. Look under "Moods" on the left side.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 00:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

That doesn't count. It's still a directory listing and is trivial. No other article mentions the moods that Allmusic uses, and they shouldn't. There are no significant sources at all. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 00:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

"In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable (which Dan Seals is), then officially released albums (which Make It Home is) may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Misplaced Pages." (WP:NALBUMS) I feel the directories do verify the album's existence, and mentions in the press verify the album's notability. I don't understand why a "review" must exist to prove an album's notability. --Lost Fugitive (talk) 00:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Track lyrics and listings are not trivial information, neither are commentaries on the album's mood and style. The information about 1990 is to help explain the context of the album and that the performer was at the end of his career. I probably would've voted to keep the Collin Raye album, because I assume at the least the above information was available and it applies to the principle I quoted. --Lost Fugitive (talk) 00:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

You can't claim the article can't be expanded because it can, descriptions of the content can be added from track lyrics from CMT. And wikipedia is not a democracy, thankfully, and I don't believe the votes are a reflection of wikipedia policy. This isn't some garage band or a non-notable individual, its Dan Seals.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 01:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

By just explaining what the songs are about, and not going any further, like a synopsis.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 01:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Why? It's a legitimate use of a primary source.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 01:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

The cutoff should be at whether enough reliable sources exist to create an article that can be more than a track list. If the lyrics are available at a reliable source, and if the album is documented in several directories, then an article that is more than a track list can be created.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 04:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

This discussion has been included on the articles for deletion page.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 21:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Blackhawk (band) split

I did some measuring, and Blackhawk's page is long enough to split. They have had enough singles and albums, and their biography's long enough to split. Like i said, i did some measuring, and artist's pages such as Phil Vassar and Craig Morgan have been splitted, and this page (the biography) is about the same length, which is long enough to split. Would you agree or oppose this split? I already put it on the band article's talkpage, so you can comment there if you'd like. Ryanbstevens (talk) 02:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Help offered

After your advice above, I've offered to have a look at Billy Gilman. As requested above, but possibly missed by you, could you just quickly comment on the sources at Talk:Billy Gilman#Sources. I can write an article, and copyedit, but my confidence in country music reliable sources is not so good! Bigger digger (talk) 12:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Gwinhurst, Delaware

Just curious why you think this community doesn't deserve an article, seeing that longstanding consensus has held that all communities are notable? Nyttend (talk) 18:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I've made a policy-based argument at the AFD; would you please revisit it and respond, either by changing your vote or explaining why you continue to believe that it shouldn't remain a separate article? Nyttend (talk) 21:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

AFD repair

Thanks for that repair work, I wasn't sure what I had done wrong there. Alastairward (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Jeopardy! & Editor Assistance

If you'd like, since you've also made several good faith edits to the Jeopardy! article, please provide commentary here. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Let it be noted for the record that I object to the one-sided canvassing Sottolacqua is engaging in. Robert K S (talk) 23:59, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

"How is he canvassing?" Canvassing doesn't require him telling you what your opinion should be. (Such would be superfluous, since you agree with him, which is the very fact that led him to post the message to your talk page.) Canvassing is him notifying you and not, for example, me, or others who might productively contribute to the discussion. Instead, he has invited you so that you may buttress his position, which I think you've dutifully done. Robert K S (talk) 00:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

All that big stink and apparently no interest by either you or Sotto in discussing issues on Talk:Jeopardy!? BTW, even the pro-tagging essay WP:TAGGING states, "Any editor who sees a tag, but does not see any problem with the article, and who does not see any detailed complaint on the talk page, may remove the tag." Robert K S (talk) 18:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: TFD for {{cite newsgroup}}

Thanks for the message on my talk page. I know I'm not currently actively editing Misplaced Pages (mostly due to time limitations), but I do try and keep up. :-) Jude (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Stew Herrera

I fixed the Stew Herrera WP:AFD for you. You forgot to include "subst:" in the formula when you first initiated the WP:AFD for Herrera and the "this article's entry" prompt was thus still red-linked. Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 12:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey - can you explain what "Glitchy Twinkle is glitchy. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat" means? I have no idea what you're talking about. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 18:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh. I have had bad experiences with WP:TWINKLE myself. Very bad. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 18:08, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Homestead Bicycles

According the tag at the bottom of my post which was incorrectly (and rudely) deleted, it states that I can request the page. Can you please send it to me? Thank You. Nedla detsmlo (talk) 16:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Family Brown

"But It's Cheating" did in fact chart twice, on April 26, 1980 and February 20, 1982. Eric444 (talk) 22:34, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Music video screenshots

If i take a screenshot of a music video, despite me taking the pictures, does someone or something else own the copyrights to the screenshots? I was told about copyright licensing over the photos on "Goodbye Says It All", and i figured that since i took the images, it seemed like a misunderstanding. (Taking a music video screenshot of a computer or TV screen is the same as taking a picture of friends and/or family or an object, which a screen is, and the copyright images of friends and family pictures and objects would belong to the person who took them.) Ryanbstevens (talk) 22:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

"When DGAF takes a vacation, it does as Treelo does"

Got a reason why your wikistress levels are high, you do too much. Why not do as your dumb little buddies, me and Gorgy, do and not exceed your personal best in edit count each day. Wikistress here is low and we don't carry around Nerfbats masquerading as the occasionally lucky at being a cluebat cluebat 'cept in this case when I do but it knows it's a nerfbat. I get it, you have allll of the country music articles to tend to of the blue and redlink kind but us WikiSloths know no work ethic or responsiblities. We just sit around and make stupid jokes in edit summaries when we revert someone, it's easy, not soul-sucking and best of all... fun. Where's the fun in your day, bubba? treelo _radda 23:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Meh. I've got nothing better to do than edit Misplaced Pages anyway. I am just one huge ball of stress, so it's not like limiting myself would do any good. In fact, it'd probably be worse, as I really want to help the project as much as possible, but I just keep overloading my plate. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 23:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Help...? What is this.. help you speak of? I come to goof off, no dedication here but the second you get all dedicated is the very second you lose interest in having fun with me and Gorgy. If I have fun, I then have something to aim for hence why I couldn't do this whole career editor (with no pay) thing editors similar to you do. I'm probably getting gooey in my old age here but I get stressed easily now so just try and do as little as possible. Maybe I lack motivation, need to cut my hair, turn that crap down and get a real job but no, I'll sit here... doing nothing... as nothing is good... if you're me, I'm lazy like that. But you, what do we do with you before the wall beckons and forces you to sit down with us two and play Random Pop Culture Reference Quiz Challenge Quizwang? treelo _radda 23:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, you know, help in that Wiki way. I don't really do big things as you can tell, just a metric buttload (3.3 American buttloads) of smaller things. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 23:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

WHY ARE YOU STALKING ME! Yngvarr (t) (c) 23:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Butt out, Gorgy. I have little better to do beyond read the noticeboards so I counted today's edits for you today and it's a decent 280 edits, I compared that against mine and for the same amount of edits that'd take me back to mid April so you make in a day what I make in a month. I'd imagine things'd come of that which are negative. Do you only read the first few lines of my posts and respond to what you think is answerable? Making sure you listen to what I say... so, again, what do we do with you before the bonkwall beckons and forces you to sit down with us two and play Random Pop Culture Reference Quiz Challenge Quizwang? treelo _radda 00:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

What to do with me, the otters, and the bat? Give us Nutty Bars and birch beer? I dunno. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 00:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

You and the otters, fine. The no-clue-bat nerfbat however, much like the cake, is a lie and must stay home. Birch beer and Nutty bars? It's like entering the 60's with you... treelo _radda 00:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

You are aware that my cluebat is a real bat of the flying mammal kind, right? Don't leave her out. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 00:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm not leaving Cheyenne out, just I know if a bat hits you whilst delivering a clue it usually hurts so one which is nerf-padded hurts nobody and therefore nobody sues. Still, you, fun, how do you have it whilst WikiOttering? treelo _radda 00:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

You really don't want to know. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 00:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

(merp) Normally I wouldn't but I'm a bit indifferent towards HTF. Anyway, happy wikibonking day whenever it might be, we'll be waiting with our board and remember, Random Pop Culture Reference Quiz Challenge Quizwang contains the word "wang" and that means you get to rotate the board! treelo _radda 00:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Kenny Rogers AfDs

Just a suggestion: Since the albums are all similar, I would advise using a multiple nomination to make things easier for yourself, the participants, and the closing admin. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm speaking of:

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sales and charts achievements for Mariah Carey

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sales and charts achievements for Mariah Carey, to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 14:50, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Normally I'd take offense to such a message and point out that I've had over four years experience as a Misplaced Pages editor (3 of which was as an Admin and Mediator), but I'm going to assume good faith and calmly inform you to be careful about how you approach and notify others. Do you know me? Do I seem like a vandal? Have I been known to post inappropriate pages on Misplaced Pages? Did you look to see if there were any other template messages that would have suited this particular situation? The page in question was constructed years ago, and has been modified dozens of time since then. These are questions you need to ask youself before you post such a message on someone else's talk page. Orane (talk) 20:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Orane (talk) has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

I really want to apologize for going off on you like that today. I was having a bad day and logged in to your message. I had no idea that your bot left it, but just be a tad bit more careful. Also, thanks for notifying me, and keep up the good work. Orane (talk) 03:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Cincinnati Mills

There's a question you might be able to answer regarding Parisian and Sakowitz. I left a message on here previously, but a sudden screw-up in session data caused it to read a shared IP, which was unfortunately blocked due to vandalism. TheListUpdater (talk) 22:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

GBH

Get a bigger hammer. Romanfall (talk) 23:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Note

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Please refrain from making inappropriate XfD nominations such as:

...and user subpage MfD nominations such as:

Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

Oh, and give me back my cluebat!

--Tothwolf (talk) 23:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Edited to include Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/News.admin.net-abuse.email in the list above. Tothwolf (talk) 00:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Lauren Jane Grayson

I don't think CSD#G1 applies; indeed, it very rarely applies to new articles. It isn't patent nonsense as defined by the CSD (see WP:Patent nonsense). It looks like a hoax, which would be blatant vandalism, under CSD#G3. Fences and windows (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Is There Life Out There

On May 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Is There Life Out There, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 00:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Sortable lists

Someone posted a question for you about setting this up to avoid the "need" for List of Grand Slam Men's Singles champions (reverse chronological order). FYI. Have a nice weekend. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for posting a response. I hadn't looked into it in detail, but I saw a question posted for you and didn't want you to miss it. I'm always intrigued by novel solutions to what seem like nuisance issues. I had no idea lists could even be sortable, so I'll have to look. Have a nice weekend. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:38, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Re AfD of Lillian Virginia Mountweazel

Hello, I noticed you left a message on my talk page with regards to the AfD nomination of Lillian Virginia Mountweazel. It's true I created the article, but as a redirect. It may be useful to contact the user who converted the redirect to an article. — Edward Z. Yang 02:26, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

redlinks

Not the intention - we are standardising the cleanup category names a little. Missing cats now created, the old ones "since" will go in due course. Rich Farmbrough, 02:29 23 May 2009 (UTC).

Bitterblue

This is an example (already on the page, I didn't do anything to it except a lot of work around the page) of a Production Credits list more along the style that I think is cleaner. I worked on the Hide Your Heart album earlier (I think that's it), and I listed six or seven assistant engineers, four bassists, two trumpeteers, etc...and it looks messy. Bitterblue's layout looks much cleaner and I think needs to be strongly considered for inclusion in policies.

Keeping opinion separate from that of current editing policy and looking at it as a strictly personal view, what do you think? CycloneGU (talk) 03:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Cheers, will do. CycloneGU (talk) 18:48, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Feel like chiming in an opinion? I put in a very long talk page message on the albums talk page. CycloneGU (talk) 20:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

After the (brief) discussion and the confirmation from IllaZilla, I'm going to start doing my listings in the fashion we've discussed. It might take a little more work, but if we're supposed to use small letters for the tasks in the project's listed format, it's not really that much more work. I still think my way is cleaner. =) CycloneGU (talk) 03:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Albums as section titles

I don't think it is best to use albums as section titles when describing a performer's career. Take for instance, Neal McCoy, great work on expanding the article but using the albums as section titles is confusing to readers who don't know all of the artist's albums and for those who want to read about a specific time in his career. Albums aren't everything in a musician's career, and using them makes the titles unnecessarily long. I prefer to use titles that label the career in as little words as possible, and/or use years. Let me know what you think about this.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 06:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Nice work. The article looks really good now. Possible GA? --Lost Fugitive (talk) 16:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

I've been working on the Roger Miller article lately, I haven't gotten to the Personal Life section yet, but how do you think it's progressing? --Lost Fugitive (talk) 17:07, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I was really surprised to see it in the shape that it was in. --Lost Fugitive (talk) 17:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey!

Knock it off eh?

You've been here long enough to know CSD G3 does not apply to user subpages such as and You've certainly been here long enough to know better than to simply remove dead links instead of marking them as a {{dead link}} , especially with a page like Misplaced Pages:List of banned users. Tothwolf (talk) 14:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Closed joint RFD with only one deletion

Hi, TenPoundHammer. Both Misplaced Pages:Example of a self-redirect and Misplaced Pages:Example of a double redirect were brought for RFD, and closed, but only the self-redirect was addressed. Cheers. -- JHunterJ (talk) 01:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Great Glass Elevator

Hey, just a heads up that I've redirected this article instead of deleting it. Incidentally, that book was a favorite of mine when I was a kid. Who can forget Vermicious K'nids? TNXMan 01:55, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Question

Thank you for responding! I do have credible sources. I am interning for the organization, and have used all of their official documents that I have used to create the page. Along with the official website, I have numerous articles on the organization. I have e-mailed wikipedia with the copyright form they asked to me released by the owner, but have not heard work back. I don't know what else to do though in creating the page and not having it deleted! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erika.boll (talk • contribs) 05:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes I have a bunch of articles and had them on the page as media, but it was still deleted. I have a draft of the page but it's fairly simple and I'm not sure if I need to reference the sources another way... I just have them attached to the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erika.boll (talk • contribs) 17:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

I have looked through the NPOV but do not know how to change the information about the organization to work accordingly. I want to simply put up facts about the organization but don't know how to phrase it any different, as they are just facts. And, thanks again for all of your help thus far! This is my first time using wikipedia, and it's far more difficult than I thought! I definitely need all of the help I can get (: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erika.boll (talk • contribs) 19:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

I looked through and took some things out. Is it okay to still include the method they use (its listed with bullets) and discuss the organization's current projects and progress? (Erika.boll (talk) 00:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC))

DYK nomination of Family Brown

Hello! Your submission of Family Brown at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! JamieS93 17:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Teatime

Thanks for fixing the AfD. My broadband connection died at much the time that Twinkle didn't complete. All happyish now, though. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

ThankSpam

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my "RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (Ceoil, Noroton and Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record.
I recognise that the process itself was unusual, and the format was generally considered questionable - and I accept that I was mistaken in my perception of how it would be received - but I am particularly grateful for those whose opposes and neutrals were based in perceptions of how I was not performing to the standards expected of an administrator. As much as the support I received, those comments are hopefully going to allow me to be a better contributor to the project. Thank you. Very much. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

~~~~~

My mistake there

Yeah, I didn't realise articles and templates have a different procedure, I've only nominated for articles before. I've listed it under WP:TFD now, and I'll make the discussion more explicit. YeshuaDavid (talk) 22:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Please reconsider a deletion recommendation

TenPoundHammer...I see that you suggested deleting the Generation Jones article with the comment "Original research, insufficient sources". I assume you based that on the claims made by the editor who proposed this deletion. Since you appear to be a credible editor who generally makes fair edits, I respectfully ask you to take a second look at this. If you look at the actual references in this article, you'll find that the nominating editor completely misrepresented the truth about these references, and that in reality, this article is in no way based on original research, and that there are more than enough reliable published sources. Thank you for your consideration.TreadingWater (talk) 22:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

I'd ask that you reflect on my Response to the TreadingWaters comments as well and comments left on TreadingWaters talk page A. Yager (talk) 11:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Category:Heathcliff

You really should not close nominations for deletion that you started as keep. Withdraw yes, but not keep. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:58, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Infoboxes

Look...there's no need to be mean. I don't know how to add an Infobox, so I'm doing what I can, which, to be frank, others could do too. Second, someone completely ERASED my additions for Liv Kristine and Miguel Bose. I don't know who, but now I can't redo them.

I give up. Thanks for nothing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbrushfan (talk • contribs) 01:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Fourth Request

When closing TFDs, please place {{TfD top}} in the proper location (after the TfDlinks line). You have once again placed {{Tfd top}} in the wrong place, as shown at Misplaced Pages:Templates for deletion#Template:The Paradiso Girls. At this point, if you cannot follow this procedure, perhaps it is best you refrain from closing TFDs. JPG-GR (talk) 16:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Total licensing

Thanks for putting the boxes around that... I got momentarily distracted at work.---I'm Spartacus! 18:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Internet Relay Chat flood

recently you withdraw your afd nom for Internet Relay Chat flood because "sources" were added. but really, they weren't. there are just a bunch of references now, that aren't sources. it looks like fluff, and the article is terribly written. are you sure that it's worthy of remaining? Theserialcomma (talk) 21:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)