| Revision as of 09:35, 29 May 2009 editJeneral28 (talk | contribs)1,258 edits →Image copyright problem with File:JMcCurdy.jpg← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:17, 29 May 2009 edit undoFrehley (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,165 edits Notifying about suspicion of sockpuppeteering. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| Thee top three are the attack dogs of this so called informative site. Any single edit--especially on TV shows which has the least value of all--they will pounce on you, read the stupid, laughable and downright chidish[REDACTED] lawas ad if they are three Gods. ] (]) 09:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | Thee top three are the attack dogs of this so called informative site. Any single edit--especially on TV shows which has the least value of all--they will pounce on you, read the stupid, laughable and downright chidish[REDACTED] lawas ad if they are three Gods. ] (]) 09:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==] case== | |||
| {| align="left" | |||
| || ] | |||
| |} | |||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ]]] 14:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:17, 29 May 2009
Image copyright problem with File:JMcCurdy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JMcCurdy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 05:58, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Soon to go on my profile page:
I do not like the following "editors"
User:Aoi--for pouncing on almost every single edit that I make with dictatorial like comments and butting into articles that he/she does not have a clue about
User:Frehley--for being extremely rude to me in his first message, for equally houding my articles like comrade User:Aoi and for being a pain when prescribing accurate information. And to you you conservative being, you are a M Cosgrove defender. Admit it yourself.
User:Amalthea for being as equally guarding extremely inaccurate information, for being a defender of hi/her chum Frehley--why only these three are bothering with on article--where re the other editors? You thre are my top most disliked people
User:Piano non troppo--for being so curt in his comments--little revision and it's a ban? Then for running to User:Aoi and giving me no such apologies since he/she made the mistake in the first place
Thee top three are the attack dogs of this so called informative site. Any single edit--especially on TV shows which has the least value of all--they will pounce on you, read the stupid, laughable and downright chidish[REDACTED] lawas ad if they are three Gods. Jeneral28 (talk) 09:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeneral28 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Frehley 14:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)