| Revision as of 20:18, 30 May 2009 editLittleolive oil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,081 edits →3RR: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:19, 30 May 2009 edit undoLittleolive oil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,081 editsm →3RRNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| == 3RR == | == 3RR == | ||
| Hi Betty. You are by my count at 3RR. Please check . If you revert again you risk being blocked. |
Hi Betty. You are by my count at 3RR. Please check ] for further information. If you revert again you risk being blocked. Thanks. (] (]) 20:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)) | ||
Revision as of 20:19, 30 May 2009
TM as a specific meditational practice is a Hindu, tantric practice.
TM as a specific meditational practice is a Hindu, tantric practice and this is a well established fact. For example see the writings Swami Sivananda for details on mental mantra meditation and use of bija mantras. Numerous published pundits discuss this, as well as at least one TM court case where a reputable Hindu swami and guru testified to this very fact as an expert witness.
School practice is also revelvant due to past court rulings and current events.
The school controversy also needs to remain, esp. since it represents a current topic, as well as one in the past which received much media attention--as well as legal action which is also significant in regards to "TM as religious activity"/separation of church and state. The precendent of previous court decisions had determined that TM was religious, again another very relevant, albeit controversial, issue.
- Maybe it does - but why inundate the TM article with it? It was already sitting at the most appropriate place.
Peterklutz 00:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
May 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Patañjali. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Buddhipriya 06:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3RR
Hi Betty. You are by my count at 3RR. Please check WP:Revert for further information. If you revert again you risk being blocked. Thanks. (olive (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC))