| Revision as of 06:22, 31 May 2009 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,447 edits →Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Molobo← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:23, 31 May 2009 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,447 edits →Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/MoloboNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| ::Nobody has told you specifically not to close (at least I have not, heck my last message to you was a suggestion on how to close as it would have been your first close), you can close it if you wish. I believe that there is an email to functionaries-l, and this has also been forwarded to arbcom (because of the existing case). I don't think a close of this case would be a good idea though without arbcom's endorsement of the result as there is an active case going and molobo has been around for quite a while. —— ''']]</font><sup><small>]</small></sup>''' 03:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | ::Nobody has told you specifically not to close (at least I have not, heck my last message to you was a suggestion on how to close as it would have been your first close), you can close it if you wish. I believe that there is an email to functionaries-l, and this has also been forwarded to arbcom (because of the existing case). I don't think a close of this case would be a good idea though without arbcom's endorsement of the result as there is an active case going and molobo has been around for quite a while. —— ''']]</font><sup><small>]</small></sup>''' 03:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::So what does this have to do with my request? --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 06:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | ::So what does this have to do with my request? --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 06:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| I don't understand. My question is simple, and so should be your answer: "Yes, here you go" or "No, I'll not give you the evidence (that other admins have seen) because...". Please chose one of those and give me proper reply :) Thanks, --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 12:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK for Claude H. Van Tyne == | == DYK for Claude H. Van Tyne == | ||
Revision as of 12:23, 31 May 2009
 Archives |
Thekohser/MyWikiBiz
Please see my reply to your blocking Greg from his talkpage here . Ripberger (talk) 05:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Replied. AdjustShift (talk) 12:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Absent a clear and compelling reason to keep the ban in place, I plan to change this. See User_talk:Thekohser. ++Lar: t/c 14:44, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
(Refactored from User_talk:Lar per my policy) I think Thekohser/MyWikiBiz should be allowed to edit one talkpage. AdjustShift (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm willing to lift the block on the talk page of Thekohser. Can I? AdjustShift (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- You're certainly technically capable of doing it. I believe it is within policy to do so as well... blocking user talk pages is an admin discretion thing. So I think you should go ahead and do so. Thanks for taking the decision to do it. ++Lar: t/c 15:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input, Lar. Have a nice day! AdjustShift (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- You're certainly technically capable of doing it. I believe it is within policy to do so as well... blocking user talk pages is an admin discretion thing. So I think you should go ahead and do so. Thanks for taking the decision to do it. ++Lar: t/c 15:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Molobo
As an admin, I'd like to request a copy of this "secret evidence" :) Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'll not be closing the SPI case. The case has been deferred to the CUs. AdjustShift (talk) 01:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nobody has told you specifically not to close (at least I have not, heck my last message to you was a suggestion on how to close as it would have been your first close), you can close it if you wish. I believe that there is an email to functionaries-l, and this has also been forwarded to arbcom (because of the existing case). I don't think a close of this case would be a good idea though without arbcom's endorsement of the result as there is an active case going and molobo has been around for quite a while. —— nixeagle 03:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- So what does this have to do with my request? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 06:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand. My question is simple, and so should be your answer: "Yes, here you go" or "No, I'll not give you the evidence (that other admins have seen) because...". Please chose one of those and give me proper reply :) Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 12:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Claude H. Van Tyne
|
On May 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Claude H. Van Tyne, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |