Revision as of 16:04, 31 May 2009 editIronholds (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers79,705 edits r← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:08, 31 May 2009 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,819 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:PirateSmackK/2009/May. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<!-- Messages without a ==Descriptive header== will be removed without being read--> | <!-- Messages without a ==Descriptive header== will be removed without being read--> | ||
== FYI == | |||
. ''']''' ] 14:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== May 2009 == | == May 2009 == |
Revision as of 16:08, 31 May 2009
This is PirateSmackK's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
May 2009
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for Continued disruption and outright deception including an attempt to trick a bureaucrat to granting admin rights . If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, punitive or what. An edit from two days is somehow problematic today? I'm sure EVula isn't silly enough to go promoting people to admin anyway, who shouldn't be. Majorly talk 15:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- No this editor has a history of power-lust and disruption. 1, 2, 3 This is to end this and prevent further problems. This is about the most egregious attempt at deception I've seen on wiki. Toddst1 (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- The only reason PiratesmackK isn't already blocked is because he agreed to undergo a period of supervised editing and mentoring. I think something like this completely undermines the idea that he's trying to change. He was not blocked if he agreed to be a good user. He wasn't a good user. Therefore, he should be blocked. Ironholds (talk) 16:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- No this editor has a history of power-lust and disruption. 1, 2, 3 This is to end this and prevent further problems. This is about the most egregious attempt at deception I've seen on wiki. Toddst1 (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Also see his Encyclopedia Dramatica efforts, replying to this (remove the *, spamblacklist you see with something (which has now been hidden, odd, but User:Mentifisto will back me up on this) reading along the lines of "lol, I'm just enjoying the drama at the moment". Ironholds (talk) 16:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)