| Revision as of 22:34, 1 June 2009 view sourceDougsTech (talk | contribs)10,191 edits →AN/I regarding your talkpage← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:36, 1 June 2009 view source DougsTech (talk | contribs)10,191 edits removing all this mess. do not add anything else here, i WILL revert all after this. use email if you have something to say. this is NOT up for debate nor is this a battle ground!Next edit → | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I agree with the conditions listed here - . |decline=There is currently no solid consensus to release this block. Please wait until the discussion is concluded. Thanks for your patience. <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 23:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=I agree with the conditions listed here - . |decline=There is currently no solid consensus to release this block. Please wait until the discussion is concluded. Thanks for your patience. <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 23:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)}} | ||
| == Your talk page == | |||
| Hey. I have fully protected your talk page due to edit warring. If you want to post another request for unblock, please don't hesitate to ]. I will forward it then. Regards, — ]<span style="color: #999;"> // </span>] 17:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't get it. It's his talk page, and others haven't got any business forcing it to be some way he doesn't want it. Why respond to others' inappropriate behavior by preventing DT from editing his own talk page? -]<sup>(])</sup> 17:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::And, might I add, it's absurd for an admin to protect a page - and then continue to edit it, knowing only admins can do so - just like we're doing here. Unprotect the page please until Doug requests protection. If it's an edit war, we have other channels for that type of behavior. ]<sub> ] ]</sub> 17:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Question== | |||
| Hey DT. Can you clarify for me your take on the events involved in this block? Do you think any of your edits were inappropriate? Also, I think you made a statement about your committments and intentions going forward as far as editing here if you were to be unblocked. Can you clarify those for me please? Thanks. Just trying to see where this all stands now that the storm has been given some time to calm. I hope you had a good weekend and are off to a happy and healthy start to June. ] (]) 17:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :A few of the edits may have come close to violating ], but since a former admin who lost the community's trust with his tools was not blocked for making a ''clearly'' uncivil edit, it seems like my edits were not in violation. I was blocked for opposing administrators, clearly. They are the ones who control the blocks, and they did not like what I was saying. I agreed not to RFA vote for 6 months and refrain from editing any pages not in the mainspace for 21 days. I understood "refrain" to mean not to stop entirely, but to make non-controversial edits outside the mainspace (such as replying to a message left here). Happy June too! --] (]) 19:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Great news! == | |||
| My ], closed unsuccessfully at ''' (48/8/6)''' based on my withdrawal! I figured passing this on would cheer you up during your block. While I never agreed with your position on administrators, I always felt your blanket opposition not disruptive (and would have felt left out if you hadn't opposed me). I look forward to your return. Cheers and happy editing.--] (]) 18:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :It looked like your RFA would have passed had you not withdrawn, but I admire you withdrawing based on the issues by BuddngJournalist, and taking time to improve before another RFA. That kind of conduct is what makes a fine administrator. If other candidates had done the same when issues arose, we could have avoided bad admins. --] (]) 19:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Whitespace== | |||
| Hi DougsTech. I removed the whitespace. Why do you want it to remain there? ]]]<sub>(])</sub> 21:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Because I want my message to be obvious without all this other junk that keeps repeating itself. --] (]) 22:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==]<span style="display:none;">''Misplaced Pages Signpost''</span><span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: '''1 June 2009'''</span>== | |||
| {{colbegin|2}} | |||
| * From the editor: ] | |||
| * Book review: ] | |||
| * Scientology: ] | |||
| * News and notes: ] | |||
| * Misplaced Pages in the news: ] | |||
| * Features and admins: ] | |||
| * Technology report: ] | |||
| * Arbitration report: ] | |||
| {{colend}} | |||
| <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ]</div> | |||
| <small>Delivered by ] (]) at 22:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == AN/I regarding your talkpage == | |||
| I have started an AN/I regarding having your talkpage permanently protected as you are violating ]. Should you wish to comment, I have set up the appropriate tags for you to do so below. //] ] 22:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </noinclude> | |||
| <includeonly> | |||
| ;Comments by DougsTech | |||
| I should revert everything added to my talkpage, and leave what I want on there...but I keep responding to all this bait. Do whatever you want. I realize that no matter what I do, they will always try to attack me. The one page I can edit, and he wants it protected. If you don't want to see what I type, here is a hint to resolve your problem - DONT COME TO MY PAGE! REMOVE IT FROM YOUR WATCHLIST! I hope you don't suffer too much from having to read all there ''terrible'' things I write here. --] (]) 22:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </includeonly> | |||
| <noinclude> | |||
Revision as of 22:36, 1 June 2009
DougsTech 
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| Home | Talk | Contribs | Edit Count | Sandbox |
| This is DougsTech's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| This is DougsTech's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Block Notice
I am currently blocked from editing. I opposed some admins, so they came at me with a ton of deletions and blocks. Don't ever make an admin mad, they will use their tools against policy to silence or get rid of you, just because they don't like you. Overall, I was successful in my goals. The 2 goals I set were - remove bad administrators, keep bad users from becoming administrators. At least 1 bad administrator was removed, and countless others kept from being promoted. --DougsTech (talk) 06:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
DougsTech (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I agree with the conditions listed here - .
Decline reason:
There is currently no solid consensus to release this block. Please wait until the discussion is concluded. Thanks for your patience. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.