| Revision as of 19:59, 2 June 2009 editThuranX (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers20,147 edits →Superjail.: stop. Direct Warning.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:48, 2 June 2009 edit undoOnorem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,735 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Superjail!. using TWNext edit → | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| == June 2009 == | == June 2009 == | ||
| ] Please ] other editors{{#if:User talk:ThuranX|, which you did here: ]}}. If you continue, you '''will''' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> ] (]) 01:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | ] Please ] other editors{{#if:User talk:ThuranX|, which you did here: ]}}. If you continue, you '''will''' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> ] (]) 01:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Superjail!|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''Please stop until you have an actual ] to support your opinions.'' ]]] 21:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:48, 2 June 2009
February 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Mathematics. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Djk3 (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mathematics. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ·Add§hore· /Cont 16:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
·Add§hore· /Cont 07:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Vandal ?
As you can read in the official Misplaced Pages policy on verifiability:
- The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth.
I'm sorry if this is news for you, but nobody cares about your opinion on the matter, whether it is true or not. I am somewhat amazed that you do not realize that a sentence like the one you added does not belong in an encyclopedic article. For almost any subject – Brussels sprouts, songs by Frank Sinatra, the leather culture, you name it – there are lots of people who hate it. There are also lots of people who like it. And there are lots of people who are indifferent. Even if we could find reliable sources for these statements, do you think it is worth adding this to the articles on these topics? Most people who "hate math" are taking mathematics in school as a compulsory subject; what they actually hate is not mathematics itself, but the way it is being taught in school. An article on the relationship between how maths is taught and how it is received by the students could be an interesting article in our encyclopedia, but only if it is based on analyses provided in reliable sources.
If you were not aware of the Misplaced Pages policy on verifiability – but every editor ought to know the five pillars of Misplaced Pages – then perhaps your second edit was not vandalism. But if you continue to add it, as you threatened to do, not only would you be violating the verifiabilty policy and the policy against "original research", but you'd also be edit warring, which by itself is also against policy. Doing so would definitely qualify as vandalism. Please make yourself familiar with the Misplaced Pages core policies and guidelines, and always assume good faith and aim at reaching consensus. Happy editing! --Lambiam 09:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
In case you are interested, here is a though-provoking essay on mathematics education in the U.S. --Lambiam 19:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Mathematics has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 17:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Mathematics. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Lambiam 23:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Mathematics, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Joshua R. Davis (talk) 14:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Phil McGraw, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Phil McGraw. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Djk3 (talk) 16:04, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Phil McGraw.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Ward3001 (talk) 16:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --ElKevbo (talk) 04:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
Thanks for experimenting with the page Not Another Teen Movie on Misplaced Pages. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. ScottJ (talk) 18:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
January 2009
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Not Another Teen Movie. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. This is the second warning you have received about this exact same misinformation. If you believe I am in error, you need to provide a source for this information. (Note: don't bother looking for one because the woman in the movie is clearly not Ally Sheedy.) ScottJ (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at User:ScottJ, you will be blocked from editing. ScottJ (talk) 23:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
If you wish to leave me a message, the place to do it is on my talk page, not my user page. ScottJ (talk) 23:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Quotes in Watchmen
You know, when a word appears in the brackets it is because it wasn't part of the original quote. If you adjust a quote to fit a sentence then you must make sure you note that in the quote (i.e. placing brackets around the adjust part). This is done in some instances where the tense doesn't fit the passage it is used in, or a person was not identified in that particular sentence. You are not allowed to adjust quotes without pointing out what you have adjusted (i.e. without putting brackets on). 156.75.192.109 (talk) 15:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Superjail.
You cannot substantiate the edits you are making to the article. Please stop adding your personal opinions and speculation to the article. ThuranX (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Again, stop. YOu cannot provide citation that they are scandanavian, you are disrupting the direct quote, and you are adding your opinions. all of these are things which make the article worse, not better. ThuranX (talk) 03:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have watched the show, you hjave no sources. Further, pelase leave messages on a user's TALK page, not his front page. ThuranX (talk) 05:40, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Stop adding material which cannot be supported by citation to the article, and stop making personal attacks against me. If either event occurs again, I will bring this to the attention of administrators. ThuranX (talk) 19:59, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:ThuranX. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. ThuranX (talk) 01:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Superjail!. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please stop until you have an actual source to support your opinions. Onorem♠Dil 21:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)