Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:41, 7 June 2009

This user has retired - ALLST✰R▼ wuz here @ 03:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Not copyvios

And now Durova is CSDing articles that aren't copyvios or that had the copyvio content removed. Man, y'all are paranoid. Seriously, it looks like I'm not the one that needs to calm down and take a deep breathe. I have witnessed non-copyvio articles and images get deleted as well as images and articles of which I didn't add the copyvio content to, but got blamed for it in the edit/deletion summaries. - ALLST✰R▼ _{wuz here @} 00:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Diffs?  Frank  |  talk  00:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Try this one of yourself.. paranoia over a question mark.. if you'll look at the history you'll see where I went over the copyright info after moonwhateverhernameis brought it to my attention Friday. Which brings me to another damn point.. moonwhateverhernameis brought articles to my attention, I worked on them to correct the issues and then the witch-hunt began. - ALLST✰R▼ _{wuz here @} 00:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

That's not paranoia...it's a non-encyclopedic sentence that looks very much like it was lifted straight from a DVD sleeve. I don't have immediate access to that title or I would have checked it myself. I've already ordered a book from my library. And yes, I do have a life, believe it or not.  Frank  |  talk  00:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

If you will look at my damn edit to the article you will see I wrote the damn sentence. It's a question so why wouldn't a question have a question mark?? Yes, it is paranoia. - ALLST✰R▼ _{wuz here @} 00:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

More to the point...do you have a diff that supports "Durova is CSDing articles that aren't copyvios"?  Frank  |  talk  00:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Way to ignore your own paranoia over the question mark. Yes, see Lanier High School (Jackson, Mississippi) and tell me what in that article is now a copyvio. - ALLST✰R▼ _{wuz here @} 00:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

I have re-blocked you indefinitely for repeated copyright violations in spite of warnings not to in accordance with our copyright policy. That policy notes that "Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material despite appropriate warnings may be blocked from editing by any administrator to prevent further problems." I request that any administrators considering unblocking first review the history of this talk and the thread at the administrator's noticeboard for scale of the problem. This block has been applied in the face of significant disruption cross multiple articles and multiple years. I will make note that I have reset your block at the administrator's noticeboard. --Moonriddengirl 00:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

You can't just go and change my block and why I was blocked, after I've already been blocked. That's just WP:POINT and punishment, which blocks are not supposed to be for. You should be desysopped for that move. - ALLST✰R▼ _{wuz here @} 00:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

You've drawn attention to yourself and been combative at every step, and further information has come to light as a result of the intense scrutiny. WP:POINT is about disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point. Reaffirming your block is not disruptive, it is exactly what blocks are all about - protecting the project.  Frank  |  talk  00:24, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

She reset my block as retaliation for this to make sure I am never unblocked. Whatever Frank. She should be desysopped immediately. - ALLST✰R▼ _{wuz here @} 00:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

I have already reported the reblock at WP:ANI, where it will certainly receive plenty of scrutiny. You have taken my actions personally from the beginning, so I am not surprised that you would see this in similar light. --Moonriddengirl 00:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

The admin that blocked my talk page should be dealt with as well. That was unacceptable. - ALLST✰R▼ _{wuz here @} 00:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

You're not helping yourself. That unblock was in response to my assertion that this dialogue is not disruptive to the project. Only you have the ability to make that assertion actually true. If you want to convince uninvolved admins (not User:Durova, not me, not User:Moonriddengirl, not User:Viridae) that you should be unblocked, you could start here and join us in the cleanup by posting information here on your talk page.  Frank  |  talk  00:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)