Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:22, 8 June 2009

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Shortcuts WP:RFPP WP:RFP WP:RPP Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Skip to table of contents requests to raise protection lower protection requested edits (purge) Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Frank Sontag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

full protection dispute, Edit warring. NonvocalScream (talk) 04:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, user blocked for WP:3RR. Nakon 04:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Operation Repo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

as soon as protection expired vandalism restarted Hell in a Bucket (talk) 02:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

2009 attacks on Indian students in Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection, tendentious editing from IP addresses who are abusive to those seeking moderatated views. Kransky (talk) 01:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Note that the white-supremacist editor above is violating WP:POINT by vandalizing reliable responses to victim blaming regarding this incident, and abusing his cultivated status on wikipedia in order to pursue revisionism. he has engaged in this vandalism before.70.112.199.223 (talk) 01:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

This would be the tendentious IP editor Kransky is referring to. Accusing editors, reliable sources, and other commentators of being "racists" and "white supremacists" sympathisers is not condusive to collaborative editing and contravenes WP:AGF, WP:NPA, and most seriously WP:BLP - to name a few. Could administrators please advise whether this is the best place to seek advice? thanks --Merbabu (talk) 02:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We'll let user cool off first. -- billinghurst (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

WWE Extreme Rules (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full-protection vandalism, Nonstop Heavy Vandalism. SuperSilver901 01:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: It's heavy on wrestling articles for some reason. I would advocate protection, though I don't know if full protection is necessary. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 01:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

It is a bit unnecessary for a full protection but I was getting very annoyed with them. One person protected it for ONE DAY! Is there any possible way that you could extend it a bit?--SuperSilver901 01:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Sassanid Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary cascading full protection dispute, There's a dispute of edits in the infobox and the first three paragraphs of the article. I think the dispute should be stopped. Jupiter.solarsyst.comm.arm.milk.universe 00:03, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. KrakatoaKatie 00:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

2009 ICC World Twenty20 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism, Page being vandalised during tournament. Incorrect results being displayed, and people changing score, etc. I personally think a semi-protect during the tournament (2 weeks till 21st June) would be good.  Halo2  23:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: I completely agree that this should be semi-protected. --Scott (talk) 23:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 15 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - KrakatoaKatie 00:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Halo2  00:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome! - KrakatoaKatie 01:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Jean Chrétien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, There has been vandalism by mainly anonymous users on this page and I want it to stop!. Jupiter.solarsyst.comm.arm.milk.universe 23:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - KrakatoaKatie 00:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Andrew Brons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism, First BNP MEP. Now asking for post-emptive action. It is fairly obvious that this is becoming a problem article A.C. Norman (talk) 22:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for 6 hours by Rodhullandemu. Icestorm815 • Talk 23:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Andrew Brons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism, First BNP MEP. If there was a case for pre-emptive protection, this is it. Sceptre 22:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Also, there has been very little vandalism on the article and that vandalism is isolated and in-frequent which means that protection is not required. All the Best, Mifter (talk) 22:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Batman: Arkham Asylum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protect --Repeated removal of reliable sourced material, and registered users cannot work to get the article to C or even B class due to constantly having to revert these edits. --Teancum (talk) 21:44, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - KrakatoaKatie 21:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Dissidia: Final Fantasy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary Semi-protection, IP users adding speculatory information about English voice actors. The article was previously semi-protected for two weeks from May 22 to June 5, and now that it has been unprotected the IPs have picked up right where they left off. The Clawed One (talk) 21:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by KrakatoaKatie. Mifter (talk) 21:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I replied to the wrong request - this one was first when I protected the article, but a new request replaced this one by the time I got back here to reply. I think I've fixed it now. KrakatoaKatie 21:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. ^_^ The Clawed One (talk) 21:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

United States presidential election, 2012 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, There are constantly edit wars. Jerzeykydd (talk) 21:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Best, Mifter (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

United States presidential election in California, 2008 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, A lot of people are putting unneccessary sections on the page. Jerzeykydd (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All the Best, Mifter (talk) 21:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Protection removed Per new information/discussion on my talk page Mifter (talk) 21:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Lelouch Lamperouge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Also including List of Code Geass episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. When this series ended last year in Japan, IPs started flooding in adding their theories about how the character might have lived. Now that the dub has ended on Adult Swim, it's happening again. Semi-protection for a couple weeks would be nice to keep the constant reverting of theories down. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 20:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 21:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Keri Hilson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 20:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

• Semi-protected for six months. Acalamari 20:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Relapse 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection, unsourced edits by IP's/new users return. (last protection expired May 10) There have been three instances of unjustified page moves in the past, too. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 20:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Move protected indefinitely. Mifter (talk) 20:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 20:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Steve Kouleas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semiprotection because people have been vandalizing the page for quite a while now, and it's slightly annoying to have to revert the edits by the vandals. Plus, it's been happening since Novenber.--RPGMarker35 (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 20:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Denny Rehberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semiprotection, at least, for now. Multiple non-registered editors have been waging an ongoing edit war for several days now. I'm sure this can be figured out once the dust settles, but not while they're still going at it.. user:J aka justen (talk) 18:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 19:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Middle Bass Island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, spamwar. EdBever (talk) 17:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: See also rq for South Bass Island below, that article has been semi-protected for 14 days. EdBever (talk) 17:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

I'd rather just add additional links to the blacklist so I've done this one. - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Even better, thanks! EdBever (talk) 17:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

The Apprentice (UK series five) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Being assuaged by IP CRYSTAL violations for a programme to air in four hours' time. ╟─TreasuryTag►interpellation─╢ 16:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 17:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Roger Federer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism; subject is about to win a Grand Slam tournament. —LOL /_C 15:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by Sandstein (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Xymmax _{So let it be done} 17:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

South Bass Island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Ongoing spamwar, see history... Blacklisting requested but IP-user came up with a new URL shortly after blacklisting. I'd say semiprotect until late september (end of vacation season, since this is a tourism-related site). EdBever (talk) 14:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 14 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'll extend it if he turns up after that. SlimVirgin 15:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Steve Allen (LBC radio presenter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. Cxz111 (talk) 09:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

BrokeNCYDE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

create-protection, Because it keeps getting recreated when deleted. Sceptre 06:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Creation protected Mfield (Oi!) 08:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Port Harcourt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection Various IPs (e.g. 79.74.105.8, 79.74.25.144, 79.74.8.146, 79.73.60.49, 79.74.64.35, 79.73.41.173) keep removing one of the city’s two main ethnicities. ---Ankimai (talk) 06:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Cornell College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection. There has been an upswing in recent additions that violate NPOV and are uncited. Criticisms related to employees of the college, campus policy, and members of the board of trustees have appeared on this page in the past, but do not belong here. Further vandalism is expected especially related to an unpopular building renovation on campus, several Greek groups changing status, and additional changes in college administrators after short terms in their positions. The problem is made worse by how IP addresses are assigned on campus which would make blocking IPs without blocking the entire student body impossible.O76923 (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 12:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

List of characters on 6teen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Seven articles, Caitlin Cooke, Jonesy Garcia, Nikki Wong, Jude Lizowski, Jen Masterson, Wyatt Williams, and Starr (6teen), were recently merged into this one per an AfD discussion that was closed as a speedy merger. The seven articles mentioned are all targets for repeated additions of unsourced information and fan speculation, and now as redirects, this page will recieve a hashing of all of that. As such, it needs semi-protection to protect against the repeated vandalism that it will undoubtably recieve. See the above articles for proof of this case. The Earwig 04:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. I did add it to my watch list in case of trouble. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 12:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:64.53.176.235 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection user talk of blocked user, Blocked IP has been repeatedly blanking the page for months, removing WHOIS, repeatvandal, and block notice templates. Timmeh!_{(review me)} 03:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Done Nja 09:12, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Abiogenesis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Repeated and continuous vandalism over the past week from multiple IP addresses. The Earwig 03:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Help:Reverting (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection, Repeated vandalism. gordonrox24 (talk) 02:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Here We Go Again (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, This page is for an upcoming album of singer Demi Lovato and it seems to be a target of unregistered users who are constantly placing unsourced and unreliable information in the article, specifically in the "Confirmed Tracks" section. There are hidden comment notifications in the section stating to not add information to the section without a reliable source but it's not stopping many unregistered IP users from adding unconfirmed tracks at an often manner. It's safe to say around 90%+ of the edits from unregistered users are adding the unsourced information and not adding beneficial info. I am suggesting this article be temporarily semi-protected until this information can be confirmed. The album is due to be released on July 21, 2009, but I would say a confirmed tracklist should be released by the end of the month. . Rockin56 (talk) 02:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If this list is announced before then, ask for unprotection. - KrakatoaKatie 02:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Michael Arrington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection to fight vandalism over fallout from the Leo Laport/ Gillmor Gang Youtube video — Preceding unsigned comment added by BBHoss (talk • contribs)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - KrakatoaKatie 02:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Quinton Jackson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection, IP vandalism.  Fyyer  01:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - KrakatoaKatie 02:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Edit war (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs)

semi-protection vandalism, 1 editor and 1 IP keep engaging in edit wars. Abce2|AccessDenied 01:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. - KrakatoaKatie 02:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Hee, hee, hee, an edit war on the talk page about edit warring. :) Acalamari 02:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

I know - and I think it was one guy who repeatedly logged in and out. It's Saturday night here, for cryin' out loud. He needs a hobby, like mud wrestling or something. KrakatoaKatie 02:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Fucked Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite full protection, Ongoing spam problem from users (and meatpuppets) who refuse to discuss the issue on the talk page. ThemFromSpace 01:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Note: I gave the most recent spammer a final warning; report it to WP:AIV if s/he adds the link again. I also recommend you file a report at WikiProject Spam and ask to have the link(s) blacklisted. KrakatoaKatie 02:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Reddit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, constant vandalism against this page, not many people checking it to make it right. all vandalism from unregistered users. not many positive contributions from unregistered users.--camr 00:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - KrakatoaKatie 02:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

• WP:RFUP
• WP:RFPU

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Korn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, It's been protected for a week, and i feel any longer would simply cause an over delay in new information being added. KMFDM FAN 00:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Theodore Kaczynski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection - the protection was to prevent edit warring. One side of the war has disappeared and I have managed to produce some consensus on the other side for improvements to the article. User:Kevin originally locked it but seems to be on a break or something. Thanks, Bigger digger (talk) 19:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Unprotected There does seem to be some progress on the talk page, so I've unprotected it. Icestorm815 • Talk 20:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Blockflöte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection Indefinitely cascade-protected in 2007 due to recreation over a two-month period. There's no reason it should still be protected from creation. Requesting unprotection in order to redirect this to Recorder. — Gavia immer (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Unprotected and  Done. RegardsSoWhy 19:23, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Southern California (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unprotection. Template no longer transcluded. WOSlinker (talk) 14:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Unprotected SoWhy 19:24, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Flo Rida discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, So that Flo Rida Discography can be properly retitled. I tried WP:RM but they didn't do it. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 20:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined This article was deleted and salted after repeated recreation - and this version can be speedy-deleted at any time under WP:CSD#G4. You should move the article into your userspace, for example at User:Andrewlp1991/Flo Rida discography. Then post a request to WP:DRV for review. - KrakatoaKatie 02:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Lolene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, This page has been protected as it has been created/deleted too many times. However, now there are reliable sources for the article, please see my user profile in order to see how the article looks. Thanks! p.s. i replied to Tan | 39 23:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC) message but don't think i did it in the correct way below. lolenelolene (talk) 12:04, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Please draft a copy of the page with sourcing in someplace like User:lolenelolene/draft, and reference my edit response to you here in case someone tries to delete that work in progress. When it's done, post a request to WP:DRV for review. Thanks! rootology (C)(T) 17:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Lolene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, This page has been protected as it has been created/deleted too many times. However, now there are reliable sources for the article, please see my user profile in order to see how the article looks. Thanks! lolenelolene (talk) 00:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Not unprotected. Sorry, but the second two reference links do not work (same link), and the first merely confirms that she sang as backup on a track. This does not meet the notability requirements. Tan | 39 23:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Unprotection, Ok sorry about that, i have sorted the links out now. Is this ok? lolenelolene (talk) 00:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Like a Surgeon (Ciara song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The article was previously protected duec to it not being a notable song. However, since then, its cover has been revealed and it has charted on the Billboard Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs Chart. Please consider tis. Thank You. --TrEeMaNsHoE (talk) 19:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Can you reference this? Specifically, it needs to meet the notability guideline "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable." If you can show this here, protection probably would be lifted. Tan | 39 20:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Here is the source that it charted. ----TrEeMaNsHoE (talk) 22:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

That is a pay site; I cannot access the chart to verify. Tan | 39 22:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

I have anew source. Look under L for "Like a Surgeon". You may need to make the page bigger by pushing . At the end of the song's article, it says RBH which means R&B/Hip-Hop Songs. Then youll see the number 92. ----68.21.36.152 (talk) 00:43, 6 June 2009 (UTC) Oops, forgot to sign in, that last comment was me. ----TrEeMaNsHoE (talk) 00:45, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

"Like a Surgeon" has indeed charted. The song now satisfies the inclusion guidelines. — Σxplicit 19:57, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Unprotected Tan | 39 02:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

• WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Fulfilled/denied requests

Koko Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Repeated malicious tagging of recent death. Threat of process may be sufficient, it's just a matter of respect, both for the personal subjects of articles as well as the overall editorial process. Lycurgus (talk) 12:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. rootology (C)(T) 13:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Insanity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs. Philip Trueman (talk) 11:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. rootology (C)(T) 13:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Plutonium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Repeated Vandalism. gordonrox24 (talk) 11:00, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. rootology (C)(T) 13:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)