| Revision as of 22:22, 28 November 2005 editT-man, the Wise Scarecrow (talk | contribs)4,742 edits →List of villains← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:33, 29 November 2005 edit undoT-man, the Wise Scarecrow (talk | contribs)4,742 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Can you fix it one las time? i won't edit anymore tonight, your spelling changes on comic book character were right, and also, the new titles are ok too. but remember that i'n new and i don't have you editing skills, so when we edited at the same time, i freaked out. I'd still like to keep sequential art firs and then "or Comics". Secuential art is amore wide concept, remeber that you could put hyerogligpics* or villains there, if you find the pictures!--] 05:05, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | Can you fix it one las time? i won't edit anymore tonight, your spelling changes on comic book character were right, and also, the new titles are ok too. but remember that i'n new and i don't have you editing skills, so when we edited at the same time, i freaked out. I'd still like to keep sequential art firs and then "or Comics". Secuential art is amore wide concept, remeber that you could put hyerogligpics* or villains there, if you find the pictures!--] 05:05, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :It's true that "sequential art" is a wider term than comics, but "comics" is the more widely ''recognized'' term. It's supported by the existence of ]. Right now all the villains in that section are from comics as traditionally understood (comic books or strips). More serious sequential art works are less likely to have "villains" in the conventional sense. Even McCloud calls his book ''Understanding Comics'', so I think that it's OK to have "comics" first and "sequential art" second. We can discuss it more widely on the talk page, as well, so that we can get other views. —] (] • ]) 05:22, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | :It's true that "sequential art" is a wider term than comics, but "comics" is the more widely ''recognized'' term. It's supported by the existence of ]. Right now all the villains in that section are from comics as traditionally understood (comic books or strips). More serious sequential art works are less likely to have "villains" in the conventional sense. Even McCloud calls his book ''Understanding Comics'', so I think that it's OK to have "comics" first and "sequential art" second. We can discuss it more widely on the talk page, as well, so that we can get other views. —] (] • ]) 05:22, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ::If he'd had named it Understanding Sequential Art nobady would know what's he talking about, he started calling it sequential art after he explained the term. and i'm doing it because of the same reason you corrected (very good work, i must recognize) most of the category names; and the same reason i tried to convence everybody (and failed) about calling anime, japanese animation: because this is an encyclopedia. If the ideal name of the madia, in order to get more respect for the 9th art as so, is sequential art, here is the space to do so. | |||
| ::With anime the idea now is to be generous and make the term familiar to those who have not been in touch with pop culture lately and need some info. even thoug i don't think the term is acurrate, because the call american animation "<international (in japanese)> anime", and thats because to them anime is the japanization of the word anime. why do we have to be the separatist?--] 22:22, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Er... T-man? What's going on? I had fixed several DC Comics links (such as ], ], etc.), and in your latest edit you reverted back to a version before the changes (as well as moving the toy/action figures to the top of the list instead of where I'd put them (alphabetized under "toy"). I'll back off for the moment, but I'd like it if you can restore the edits I made, like I restored your recent edits lost in the last edit conflict. —] (] • ]) 05:05, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | :Er... T-man? What's going on? I had fixed several DC Comics links (such as ], ], etc.), and in your latest edit you reverted back to a version before the changes (as well as moving the toy/action figures to the top of the list instead of where I'd put them (alphabetized under "toy"). I'll back off for the moment, but I'd like it if you can restore the edits I made, like I restored your recent edits lost in the last edit conflict. —] (] • ]) 05:05, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Line 20: | Line 16: | ||
| ::Never mind — you took care of it while I was typing those messages above! :) —] (] • ]) 05:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | ::Never mind — you took care of it while I was typing those messages above! :) —] (] • ]) 05:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Excelent Work!! sometimes i knew i don´t know the right spelling and i don't bother to check, like star safire or jink (also gy-nyu), its not intentional, its because was keeping many other names in my mind that i didn't want to forget. and then i forget to search for the correct spelling. But thanks you saved the situation!--] 06:32, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Your message == | == Your message == | ||
| Line 31: | Line 26: | ||
| == Abuse == | == Abuse == | ||
| agreed | |||
| Understood | |||
| == Gossamer == | |||
| T-Man, | |||
| I didn't make any major changes to the page. Just added ] to the list of villains and he kept disappearing. The talk page is fine, but I shouldn't have to seek its approval to make a minor addition to your 'G' page. --] 21:17, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:33, 29 November 2005
List of villains
Don't worry about the edit conflict — I've fixed it, I think. You might want to double-check to make sure I got all the DC villains you were adding back in, though. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:40, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Can you fix it one las time? i won't edit anymore tonight, your spelling changes on comic book character were right, and also, the new titles are ok too. but remember that i'n new and i don't have you editing skills, so when we edited at the same time, i freaked out. I'd still like to keep sequential art firs and then "or Comics". Secuential art is amore wide concept, remeber that you could put hyerogligpics* or villains there, if you find the pictures!--T-man, the Wise Scarecrow 05:05, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- It's true that "sequential art" is a wider term than comics, but "comics" is the more widely recognized term. It's supported by the existence of WikiProject Comics. Right now all the villains in that section are from comics as traditionally understood (comic books or strips). More serious sequential art works are less likely to have "villains" in the conventional sense. Even McCloud calls his book Understanding Comics, so I think that it's OK to have "comics" first and "sequential art" second. We can discuss it more widely on the talk page, as well, so that we can get other views. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:22, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- Er... T-man? What's going on? I had fixed several DC Comics links (such as Klarion the Witch Boy, Professor Zoom, etc.), and in your latest edit you reverted back to a version before the changes (as well as moving the toy/action figures to the top of the list instead of where I'd put them (alphabetized under "toy"). I'll back off for the moment, but I'd like it if you can restore the edits I made, like I restored your recent edits lost in the last edit conflict. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:05, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
I dunno, ha, ha, i'm too tired, i worked several hours on the page, i can't think right, man. Try to fix it with out erasing my last aportations. Your changes, except the above mentiones are right.--T-man, the Wise Scarecrow 05:10, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Klarion!!!!!!!!! that's the name!!--T-man, the Wise Scarecrow 05:11, 28 November 2005 (UTC) You are on. i think i finally got it right, i just copied your last edition, but changed novels for literature. --T-man, the Wise Scarecrow 05:23, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'll take care of it if you want, and do my best to incorporate all your additions from the last round. Edit conflicts are a pain in the ass, even for experienced editors. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:22, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- Never mind — you took care of it while I was typing those messages above! :) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Your message
Hi, T-man. I left a response to your message on my talk page. —Cleared as filed. 13:41, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Your comment on my Talk page
In regards to your comment on my Talk page, if I am deciphering your text accurately, you are both taunting Turnstep and flirting with me. First, please refrain from personal attacks. Turnstep came to me with a legitimate request for assistance, and just because I happen to agree with your viewpoint on one article does not give you the right to mock Turnstep. Please do not engage in such action again. Second, I hate to be a dissapointment, but A. I am a guy and B. my Wiki-heart belongs to another and C. I do not resemble Phoenix. Best regards, Ëvilphoenix 05:51, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Abuse
Understood