Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:|] (]) 12:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the is 24 hours. are the reverts in question. ] (]) 12:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)</div>
:<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:|] (]) 12:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the is 24 hours. are the reverts in question. ] (]) 12:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)</div>
== Siberian tiger dispute ==
William N. Connolley
On the Siberianm Tiger- article I reacted at once I saw what was written. It looked more like a tiger hoax- site with pro- tiger propaganda, then a neutral informative site.
So I edited it emidiatly to balance it.
I know for a fact that tiger do not hunt brownbears on regular basis. The article gave a clear impression that tigers usually hunt grown brown bears. They dont. Most of the killed bears are cubs or youngsters. I wrote that, but it was deleted.
I wrote it was very rear that tigers killed grown brown bears. That was deleted.
The article said that bears was afraid of tigers. I wrote the opposite, but again it was deleted.
The internet is filled with hoaxes, especially about tigers. Therefor its important that atleast Misplaced Pages stay neutral about this instead of hoax- articles.
I`m fearly new at this, so I did not know how to link documentation.
But I know what I`m talking about, so I have som links here to prove it. Here`s one that show that both bears and tigers have respect of eachother.
Yukadov, A.G. and Nicolaev: «Once during tracking we also noted the following fact: a tiger retreated, not attempting to hunt a large male brown bear in its den.љ The bear had set himself up for the winter in a small depression that he had dug near a fallen, broken-off shrub (Fig. 33), and the bear was quite visible. The tiger, having encountered the bear by chance, abruptly turned around at a distance of more than 25 m from this place and walked in the opposite direction by following his own old tracks.»
....
"One brown bear, which was staying in an area permanently inhabited by tigers, clearly felt himself to be the complete master in that place. Another brown bear, once abruptly turned away from his former path upon his encounter with tiger tracks.љ But a large, apparently male, Himalayan (or Asiatic black) bear (which we observed visually), like the brown bear that has already been mentioned, clearly did not fear the presence of tigers.љ He walked along the tiger's tracks and rested in the same wild boar den as did the tiger.љ"
So even a male Asiatic/Himalayan Black Bear, wich are small, did not fear the presence of the Siberian Tiger.
Link: http://tigers.ru/books/ecolog/ch12_en.html
Revision as of 13:14, 14 June 2009
Now see here you, have you even read my responses on the discussion page? Nothing you have written is accompanied by a verifiable reference. In fact, you have even modified existing text to completely contradict their own references (which are from notable, scientific sources by the way). There is a word for that: vandalism. I have already notified the administrators, and this persistant vandalism of yours is not helping you in any way.Mariomassone (talk) 11:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Siberian Tiger. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Sleaves12:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
On the Siberianm Tiger- article I reacted at once I saw what was written. It looked more like a tiger hoax- site with pro- tiger propaganda, then a neutral informative site.
So I edited it emidiatly to balance it.
I know for a fact that tiger do not hunt brownbears on regular basis. The article gave a clear impression that tigers usually hunt grown brown bears. They dont. Most of the killed bears are cubs or youngsters. I wrote that, but it was deleted.
I wrote it was very rear that tigers killed grown brown bears. That was deleted.
The article said that bears was afraid of tigers. I wrote the opposite, but again it was deleted.
The internet is filled with hoaxes, especially about tigers. Therefor its important that atleast Misplaced Pages stay neutral about this instead of hoax- articles.
I`m fearly new at this, so I did not know how to link documentation.
But I know what I`m talking about, so I have som links here to prove it. Here`s one that show that both bears and tigers have respect of eachother.
Yukadov, A.G. and Nicolaev: «Once during tracking we also noted the following fact: a tiger retreated, not attempting to hunt a large male brown bear in its den.љ The bear had set himself up for the winter in a small depression that he had dug near a fallen, broken-off shrub (Fig. 33), and the bear was quite visible. The tiger, having encountered the bear by chance, abruptly turned around at a distance of more than 25 m from this place and walked in the opposite direction by following his own old tracks.»
....
"One brown bear, which was staying in an area permanently inhabited by tigers, clearly felt himself to be the complete master in that place. Another brown bear, once abruptly turned away from his former path upon his encounter with tiger tracks.љ But a large, apparently male, Himalayan (or Asiatic black) bear (which we observed visually), like the brown bear that has already been mentioned, clearly did not fear the presence of tigers.љ He walked along the tiger's tracks and rested in the same wild boar den as did the tiger.љ"
So even a male Asiatic/Himalayan Black Bear, wich are small, did not fear the presence of the Siberian Tiger.
Link: http://tigers.ru/books/ecolog/ch12_en.html
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Siberian Tiger. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Sleaves 12:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
