| Revision as of 22:19, 12 June 2009 editMartinlc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,187 edits explanation of why material was removed← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:15, 15 June 2009 edit undoMartinlc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,187 edits 3rr warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| I note you have reverted changes to ] again. When making edits, please include an edit summary explaining briefly changes made and the reason for them. The material you undeleted was removed because it had no references to Reliable Sources in contravention of ]. If you wish similar content to appear on the article you should find some third party sources (such as newspapers) as evidence. If you are unsure how to proceed, raise the issue on the Talk page for the article.] (]) 22:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC) | I note you have reverted changes to ] again. When making edits, please include an edit summary explaining briefly changes made and the reason for them. The material you undeleted was removed because it had no references to Reliable Sources in contravention of ]. If you wish similar content to appear on the article you should find some third party sources (such as newspapers) as evidence. If you are unsure how to proceed, raise the issue on the Talk page for the article.] (]) 22:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Nerissa Corazon Soon-Ruiz|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:Use the article talk page to discuss and come to an agreement|Use the article talk page to discuss and come to an agreement|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->] (]) 09:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:15, 15 June 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nerissa Corazon Soon-Ruiz. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Use the article talk page to discuss and come to an agreement GedUK 07:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. GedUK 10:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
I note you have reverted changes to Nerissa Corazon Soon-Ruiz again. When making edits, please include an edit summary explaining briefly changes made and the reason for them. The material you undeleted was removed because it had no references to Reliable Sources in contravention of WP:BLP. If you wish similar content to appear on the article you should find some third party sources (such as newspapers) as evidence. If you are unsure how to proceed, raise the issue on the Talk page for the article.Martinlc (talk) 22:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nerissa Corazon Soon-Ruiz. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Use the article talk page to discuss and come to an agreementMartinlc (talk) 09:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)