| Revision as of 13:14, 2 December 2005 editCbaus (talk | contribs)44 edits Reponse to accusation I am not who I am← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:15, 2 December 2005 edit undoCbaus (talk | contribs)44 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| It is suspected that this user is actually ], see ] for evidence of this. | "It is suspected that this user is actually ], see ] for evidence of this." | ||
| What kind of ignorance does it take to make such an assumption? Can the unnamed person who posted the above please tell me if they honestly believe there are no other people in the world that take a more balanced view of Lott's work, and thus that every single viewpoint contrary to yours must be coming from Lott himself? | cbaus responds: What kind of ignorance does it take to make such an assumption? Can the unnamed person who posted the above please tell me if they honestly believe there are no other people in the world that take a more balanced view of Lott's work, and thus that every single viewpoint contrary to yours must be coming from Lott himself? | ||
Revision as of 13:15, 2 December 2005
"It is suspected that this user is actually John_Lott, see Talk:John_Lott for evidence of this."
cbaus responds: What kind of ignorance does it take to make such an assumption? Can the unnamed person who posted the above please tell me if they honestly believe there are no other people in the world that take a more balanced view of Lott's work, and thus that every single viewpoint contrary to yours must be coming from Lott himself?