Talk:Mike Quigley: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 07:04, 28 April 2009 editAervanath (talk \| contribs)13,901 editsm →Article title?: sp← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:26, 4 July 2009 edit undoQqqqqq (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,929 edits →Article title?: I'm not sure what the outcome of the discussion was.Next edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:
	**Right. If both ] and ] go to the same place, why not just have one of each go to the politician and the athlete. Seems unnecessary to have a disambig page for this and more straightforward just to have a see-also message at the top of each bio article. ] (]) 20:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)		**Right. If both ] and ] go to the same place, why not just have one of each go to the politician and the athlete. Seems unnecessary to have a disambig page for this and more straightforward just to have a see-also message at the top of each bio article. ] (]) 20:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->		:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

			What ever happened on this? I think the footballer got moved, but the politician didn't. I'm not sure what the outcome of the discussion was. ] (]) 05:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:26, 4 July 2009

Illinois Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Stub‑class

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Would it be possible to add the following:

"Mr. Quigley is a heterosexual, but he has a large number of gay constituents and is supportive of gay causes. Recently, he played hockey in the Gay Games hosted in Chicago."

Is the following sentence really necessary? "Quigley did not receive the endorsements of any organized labor union in the 2006 election." It seems to me that if we apply the endorsement preferences of a special-interest groups (big labor, big business, Greenpeace, N.R.A., Planned Parenthood, etc.) to Quigley, then we should include it for all politicians or Board Commissioners as a matter of consistency.

I've removed that unsourced sentence per WP:BLP. The article is being hammered with anonymous vandalism today so I've given it semi-protection for a day. —Sean Whitton / 16:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

This guy is a total tool. Let people edit this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.32.91 (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Agreed, 100% —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.43.207.114 (talk) 17:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Alright keep it the way it is —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.32.91 (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Article title?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was moved to Michael Quigley, and Mike Quigley (footballer) moved to Mike Quigley, hatnotes to be added to disambiguate -- Aervanath (talk) 07:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

If the other Michael Quigley is located at Mike Quigley (footballer), can't the Congressman be located at Michael Quigley and the footballer at Mike Quigley? Qqqqqq (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
I guess they can be. But is it the best solution? I'd like to see some evidence. I can see neither harm nor benefit in the proposal, so I'd leave it as is. Andrewa (talk) 09:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Currently Mike Quigley redirects to Michael Quigley, which is a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Right. If both Mike Quigley and Michael Quigley go to the same place, why not just have one of each go to the politician and the athlete. Seems unnecessary to have a disambig page for this and more straightforward just to have a see-also message at the top of each bio article. Qqqqqq (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

What ever happened on this? I think the footballer got moved, but the politician didn't. I'm not sure what the outcome of the discussion was. Qqqqqq (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Categories: