| Revision as of 02:49, 6 December 2005 editHereToHelp (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,936 edits My contribution to this talk or talk related page.← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:49, 6 December 2005 edit undoHereToHelp (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,936 editsm formattingNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| To be consistent with the Misplaced Pages article ], would not a move to <nowiki>]</nowiki> be appropriate. ] ] | To be consistent with the Misplaced Pages article ], would not a move to <nowiki>]</nowiki> be appropriate. ] ] | ||
| ==Include link to ] or not? | ==Include link to ] or not?== | ||
| I think we should, it's disambiguating, and it ''is'' humor. It's just a link. Go to ] and there's a link to ]. Let's just put it in; it's not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no space requirement, and after all, it's just a link. --] (]) 02:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | I think we should, it's disambiguating, and it ''is'' humor. It's just a link. Go to ] and there's a link to ]. Let's just put it in; it's not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no space requirement, and after all, it's just a link. --] (]) 02:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:49, 6 December 2005
Possible move
To be consistent with the Misplaced Pages article humour, would not a move to ] be appropriate. Mintguy (T)
Include link to Category:Misplaced Pages humor or not?
I think we should, it's disambiguating, and it is humor. It's just a link. Go to image and there's a link to Misplaced Pages:image. Let's just put it in; it's not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no space requirement, and after all, it's just a link. --HereToHelp (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)