| Revision as of 16:38, 20 July 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Tom harrison/Archive 2009.← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:40, 20 July 2009 edit undoShock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk | contribs)15,524 edits Notification of arbcom discussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
| Thanks for signing up for the ]. Misplaced Pages stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at ]. Thanks again for your participation! --].].] 21:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | Thanks for signing up for the ]. Misplaced Pages stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at ]. Thanks again for your participation! --].].] 21:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==Notification of arbcom discussion== | |||
| Your actions have been discussed as relevant to an ongoing arbitration case. You may wish to comment. I have linked a prior version of the page because the person who added this material reverted it and then incorporated the material by reference to the reversion, so as to make it impossible for you simply to search for your name. (Hope that's not too confusing.) ] (]) 17:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:40, 20 July 2009
For new users
If you are new here, welcome. The page Misplaced Pages:Welcome, newcomers has links to a tutorial, and answers to frequently-asked questions.
Archives
| This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tom harrison/Archive 2007 . Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Misplaced Pages:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Rapture
I have demonstrated on the talk page that skywriters edits are original research, do not represent any christian organization or theologian's views, and has used false and fictious sources, to control page. There are three or four editors who are working together to control the page. Osprey9713 (talk) 20:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- People aren't conspiring against you to control what Misplaced Pages says about the Rapture. You can't keep reverting to force in your preferred version. It's disruptive. Tom Harrison 20:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Jon & Kate Plus 8 DVD Section
I have told all the other users, many, many times there are three release dates for a reason. The first one, for a release through TLC/Discovery, the second for a store release, both in the U.S. only and the third one is a store release in Canada, since for some reason it was delayed here. Yes I checked around stores, couldn't find. Not to mention (which I've told other users) I checked on a store's website - Chapters/Indigo and that's where I got the release dates from.
I put the dates in, no one objected, I put the table in with all the dates, no on objected. So why now after all this time? Why didn't someone else put the table or the dates? Why didn't they change it when I created it? Why doesn't someone else verify facts instead changing it and telling me I'm wrong?
I keep putting all those dates in for a reason, which everyone ignores and it's really bugging me. I'm tired of "discusiing" it, when the only answer I get is that I have no clue what I'm doing or saying!! R7604 (talk) 21:58, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
P.S. I would like those dates back and be done with it. If other show have more then one release for one region, why not Jon & Kate Plus 8? R7604 (talk) 21:58, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- You don't own the section and, if you would bother to discuss this on the talk page, you'd see there's currently a favor building toward keeping the current version (IE: not yours). --13 23:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
User:R7604
User:R7604, the user I reported to WP:ANI (and you subsequently protected the page to intervene) is still adamantly refusing to discuss and gain consensus on the talk page of the article (where several people have started building a consensus) and, instead, has started coming to my talk page to harass me about this issue and has called me a "buttinsky" which, while rather juvenile, would still be considered uncivil. I'm at my wit's end here. I'm getting increasingly frustrating and feeling more and more uncomfortable. Could I please get some advice or help on this issue? Thank you. --13 23:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'll ask the user to disengage. It's probably best to try and ignore anything you find uncivil or provocative. Best case, the user will respect the clear consensus on the talk page and let it go. Tom Harrison 00:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advice and help in this matter. I really appreciate it. --13 12:43, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
I have no idea why I'm in the wrong and yet apparently I am. Interesting how this happens and I still haven't gotten any answers. You leave me no choice...... R7604 (talk) 02:51, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Skomorokh
My concerns about this one exactly match yours. We should not be accepting the 'majority' of sources, we should be careful about the reliability of sources. I had one 'incident' with this editor (which I walked away from) where he accepted a source that was to my mind obviously biased (Leonard Peikoff) and which did not reflect mainstream academic consensus. Skomorokh's view seems to be that whatever views are published and are represented in the majority of Google hits, have consensus. Hence his tolerance of the Ayn Rand articles, whose representation in Misplaced Pages grossly overstates her acceptance in mainstream academia. You seem to have been swayed by the fact that the 'community' overwhelmingly supports his RfA, but in my experience the 'community' rarely makes any careful investigation of a candidate's background, and prefers to rely on whether they are 'nice' and therefore 'seem' to understand policy. Peter Damian (talk) 06:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- The community today isn't what I could wish, but it's the only one we have. Tom Harrison 19:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
GA Reassessment of Leprechaun
Hello. As a major contributor to this article, I thought you would want to know that it has been placed on hold as a result of its GA Sweeps Review, which can be found here. –Whitehorse1 19:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll have a look. Tom Harrison 22:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
WP:NODRAMA reminder
Thanks for signing up for the Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout. Misplaced Pages stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at Misplaced Pages:The Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout/Log. Thanks again for your participation! --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 21:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Notification of arbcom discussion
Your actions have been discussed here as relevant to an ongoing arbitration case. You may wish to comment. I have linked a prior version of the page because the person who added this material reverted it and then incorporated the material by reference to the reversion, so as to make it impossible for you simply to search for your name. (Hope that's not too confusing.) Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)