Misplaced Pages

User talk:Stifle/Archive 0409: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Stifle Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:47, 4 December 2005 editStifle (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators84,094 edits Re: Speedy deletion of bands← Previous edit Revision as of 11:44, 6 December 2005 edit undoRandwicked (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,887 edits GingerfieldNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:


:Yes, I fully agree that they should be speediable; it missed passing by 1% in the last vote :( ] 23:47, 4 December 2005 (UTC) :Yes, I fully agree that they should be speediable; it missed passing by 1% in the last vote :( ] 23:47, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

== Gingerfield ==

Hi Stifle,
they are all cut-paste jobs of ] articles with the names changed. I will state this next time. - ] 11:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:44, 6 December 2005

Archived: October-November 2005

Mende Nazer

I've expanded Mende Nazer and added references. Do you still want to delete it? -- Dalbury 01:01, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Chugchucaras

Please be a little more careful when tagging articles as "nonsense" when they can simply be wikified. It can be very offensive to newbie contributors. Kappa 17:02, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

speedy

You might want to tag Emaduddin Ahmad as well, same author generated Jalaluddin Md. Abdul Hye and Sharifuzzaman Choudhury. --Ragib 23:24, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Re: Speedy deletion of bands

Yes, I was reading A7 to include bands. Technically, since they are composed of people, I thought bands would qualify (I mean, most of these non-notable band pages are just bios of the creators more or less). I guess that is an incorrect interpretation... though it is too bad they don't qualify for speedy. Going through an AfD for a band (or anything really) that is clearly non-notable and doesn't even bother to assert notability is a pain in the ass. I agree it should be changed. Thanks for the heads up, though! I'll be sure to not speedy any bands... from now on. -Parallel or Together ? 23:46, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I fully agree that they should be speediable; it missed passing by 1% in the last vote :( Stifle 23:47, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Gingerfield

Hi Stifle, they are all cut-paste jobs of Garfield articles with the names changed. I will state this next time. - Randwicked 11:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

User talk:Stifle/Archive 0409: Difference between revisions Add topic