Revision as of 12:12, 20 July 2009 edit94.43.112.105 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:30, 22 July 2009 edit undoDas Ansehnlisch (talk | contribs)872 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Just because it's being released as a single doesn't make it notable. It still needs to meet the conditions at ] or ]. --] (]) 06:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | :Just because it's being released as a single doesn't make it notable. It still needs to meet the conditions at ] or ]. --] (]) 06:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
The video has been officially released online today. --] (]) 12:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | The video has been officially released online today. --] (]) 12:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
::JD445, all that you follow is rules. Sometimes to get the best results, rules must be broke, or as the Joker said "The only sensible way to live in this world is without rules", Ect. Hey are you part of a Misplaced Pages organization called "Delete Dept.", cause it sure seems like it. Plus, how can a band's official website not be a reliable source? Screw You JD445.--] (]) 14:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:30, 22 July 2009
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Viva la Vida or Death and All His Friends. |
Single
Just heard the track on Xfm. It's also on their playlist . Looks like it might be a single. You might want to remove that redirect. MotorsportPete93 (talk) 11:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- We need a reliable source to verify it's going to be a single. Lots of songs get played on radio but don't get released as a single. --JD554 (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- It is a single now. The announcement came out to the Coldplay mailing list and appeared on their website this morning. The article, as it was at the last revision, however, is terrible and sounds like a fanboy wiki article, not an encyclopedia entry. Definitely in need of a rewrite, but there is verifiable evidence out there (even shiny new single artwork) that proves that the article should be reinstated ... I'm just too lazy to cite it properly and get the ball rolling. Anyone else? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.225.137.250 (talk • contribs)
The band's official website confirmed that a new video for "Strawberry Swing" will be released in early August, and a digital-only single will come out on September 14. Here's the announcement: http://www.coldplay.com/newsdetail.php?id=441. That page also includes the single's artwork. Cbing01 (talk) 03:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- We still need to wait until the single has been written about in reliable sources. Until then, the article wouldn't meet the notability criteria at WP:NSONGS or WP:GNG. --JD554 (talk) 09:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Because the band's official website isn't a reliable source? That makes less than no sense. I can site a half a dozen examples from the last year where wikipedia contained wrong information from "reliable sources" that was then trumped by underground information that was proven to be true. That aside, the band's own website is hardly underground information. I don't know why this can't be accepted. And if all you've got to stand on are wikipedia rules, then the rules need to be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.225.137.250 (talk • contribs)
- Just because it's being released as a single doesn't make it notable. It still needs to meet the conditions at WP:GNG or WP:NSONGS. --JD554 (talk) 06:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
The video has been officially released online today. --94.43.112.105 (talk) 12:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- JD445, all that you follow is rules. Sometimes to get the best results, rules must be broke, or as the Joker said "The only sensible way to live in this world is without rules", Ect. Hey are you part of a Misplaced Pages organization called "Delete Dept.", cause it sure seems like it. Plus, how can a band's official website not be a reliable source? Screw You JD445.--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)