| Revision as of 16:35, 6 December 2005 edit209.173.173.90 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:04, 6 December 2005 edit undoHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits WP:NPANext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| --] responds: What kind of ignorance does it take to make such an assumption? Can the person who posted the above please tell me if he honestly believes there are no other people in the world that take a more balanced view of Lott's work, and thus that every single viewpoint contrary to yours must be coming from Lott himself? | --] responds: What kind of ignorance does it take to make such an assumption? Can the person who posted the above please tell me if he honestly believes there are no other people in the world that take a more balanced view of Lott's work, and thus that every single viewpoint contrary to yours must be coming from Lott himself? | ||
| For those who, like me, were accused by Tim Lambert of being a fake person less than two hours after they first joined the wikipedia discussion, this reading pertains very much to you! | |||
| http://www.fumento.com/weblog/archives/2005/12/tim_lamberts_ve.html | |||
| http://www.fumento.com/weblog/archives/2005/12/update_on_ips_a.html | |||
Revision as of 17:04, 6 December 2005
Tim Lambert ] posted "It is suspected that this user is actually John_Lott, see Talk:John_Lott for evidence of this."
--Cbaus responds: What kind of ignorance does it take to make such an assumption? Can the person who posted the above please tell me if he honestly believes there are no other people in the world that take a more balanced view of Lott's work, and thus that every single viewpoint contrary to yours must be coming from Lott himself?