Revision as of 18:23, 28 July 2009 editKarl Prall (talk | contribs)31 edits →StudiVZ← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:27, 28 July 2009 edit undoChrisHamburg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers1,547 edits →StudiVZNext edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Ja aber nur du trägst die Verantwortung falls dem artikel irgendwas passiert da auch nur schliesslich du haben willst dass der artikel wieder revertiert wird. ] (]) 18:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | Ja aber nur du trägst die Verantwortung falls dem artikel irgendwas passiert da auch nur schliesslich du haben willst dass der artikel wieder revertiert wird. ] (]) 18:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Jenau, ich und ] hier, sowie fünf andere Benutzer auf de-wiki. Nun setze ''ich'' ein EOD. --] (]) 18:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:27, 28 July 2009
Your AIV report
Hello. FYI, I removed your Fritzl case report to WP:AIV. AIV is for reporting people/users, not articles. If you want an article protected, you are looking for WP:RFPP. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks! There are so many places to go over here, on de-wiki it's easier. --ChrisHamburg (talk) 17:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Don't worry, you'll find everything eventually. :) —Wknight94 (talk) 17:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cherona
A tag has been placed on Cherona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Passportguy (talk) 18:15, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Smg2 logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Smg2 logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
StudiVZ
Und auf der englischen Misplaced Pages dasselbe Theater mit dir. Dann verschieb doch eben den Hauptartikel auf StudiVZ wieder zurück anstatt dass du da nen doofen Löschantrag stellst. Karl Prall (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Geht nur mit Antrag, da das Lemma durch den Redirect blockiert ist. Muss ergo erstmal gelöscht werden. --ChrisHamburg (talk) 18:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Ja aber nur du trägst die Verantwortung falls dem artikel irgendwas passiert da auch nur schliesslich du haben willst dass der artikel wieder revertiert wird. Karl Prall (talk) 18:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Jenau, ich und User:Fischkopp hier, sowie fünf andere Benutzer auf de-wiki. Nun setze ich ein EOD. --ChrisHamburg (talk) 18:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)