Misplaced Pages

Talk:Doug Holyday: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:00, 29 July 2009 editCJCurrie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators74,998 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:04, 29 July 2009 edit undoGoldDragon (talk | contribs)13,004 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
That is a matter of opinion from a tabloid, this is not like the academic ranking of ]. ] (]) 01:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC) That is a matter of opinion from a tabloid, this is not like the academic ranking of ]. ] (]) 01:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
:You are correct to note that ''Now Magazine'''s ranking of the 10 Worst Councillors in Toronto is not an academic listing. This, however, is quite beside the point. It's a ''journalistic'' ranking, and is suitable for inclusion in the article accordingly. ] (]) 04:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC) :You are correct to note that ''Now Magazine'''s ranking of the 10 Worst Councillors in Toronto is not an academic listing. This, however, is quite beside the point. It's a ''journalistic'' ranking, and is suitable for inclusion in the article accordingly. ] (]) 04:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

::A tabloid ranking is not suitable for inclusion, period. ] (]) 16:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:04, 29 July 2009

WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

from Vfd

On 18 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Doug Holyday for a record of the discussion.

NOW arrticle

FYI, the statement about Holyday being nominated as Toronto's worst councillor is tied to the previous sentences. Therefore it doesn't stand on its own but provides context for Holyday's 'voting record'. While the article doesn't specifically call him 'Toronto's worst councillor' it does put him at the top of a top ten list of the worst councillors and labels him as 'Public Enenmy Number One'. IMO that's enough to label him as the worst councillor. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 23:50, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

That is a matter of opinion from a tabloid, this is not like the academic ranking of Historical rankings of United States Presidents. GoldDragon (talk) 01:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

You are correct to note that Now Magazine's ranking of the 10 Worst Councillors in Toronto is not an academic listing. This, however, is quite beside the point. It's a journalistic ranking, and is suitable for inclusion in the article accordingly. CJCurrie (talk) 04:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
A tabloid ranking is not suitable for inclusion, period. GoldDragon (talk) 16:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Categories: