Revision as of 08:21, 20 August 2009 editPeltimikko (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,581 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:53, 20 August 2009 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:PasswordUsername/Archive.Next edit → | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
The page was protected indefinitely because a vandal moved it ten months ago. That's no good. I've unprotected the page, moved to it Yefimov (because you are right, that's where it belongs), and watchlisted it, in case the vandal hits it again. Cheers,—] • (]); 00:28, July 25, 2009 (UTC) | The page was protected indefinitely because a vandal moved it ten months ago. That's no good. I've unprotected the page, moved to it Yefimov (because you are right, that's where it belongs), and watchlisted it, in case the vandal hits it again. Cheers,—] • (]); 00:28, July 25, 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Genocide under capitalist regimes == | |||
{{tb|User talk:Anderssl|Genocide under capitalist regimes}} --] (]) 23:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Eugene Salamin == | |||
I see that you moved ] to ], with the comment that the better-known Eugene Salamin was an artist. You left intact the various links to ], which became a redirect page as a result of your move. | |||
: | |||
The natural next steps would be: | |||
* Fix the links. Writing <nowiki>]</nowiki> will cause the reader to see ], and when the reader clicks on the link the article ] will come up. | |||
* '''Either''' change the new ] redirect page that you created by moving the article, into a disambiguation page, one of the links being to ], and click on the link and write the new article, '''or else''' make the new redirect page into an article about the artist, with a disambiguation notice at the top saying | |||
:: ''For the mathematician, see ]'' | |||
: or words to that effect. | |||
: | |||
I'd do those things myself if I knew anything about the person. ] (]) 04:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Question regarding your edits on ] == | == Question regarding your edits on ] == |
Revision as of 15:53, 20 August 2009
Archives:
|
Mil. history assessment
Hello, PasswordUsername. You have new messages at AustralianRupert's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— AustralianRupert (talk) 06:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
H. rights in the U.S.
Thanks for your edit there that not everyone received equal treatment per the Constitution, that being reserved for landed white males in keeping with the custom of the day. I did add that the first U.S human rights group was anti-slavery, re-arranged, and indicated the evolution of rights over time to include wider classes of individuals, reflecting the content of the article. Cheers! PētersV TALK 18:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Timoshenko
What goes on in the heads of the people who think "Семён" is best romanized "Semen", I will never understand :) I have moved the article to Semyon Timoshenko, which didn't require admin rights to do. I suspect you were trying to move it to "Semyon Tymoshenko", no?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:22, July 16, 2009 (UTC)
Yefimov
The page was protected indefinitely because a vandal moved it ten months ago. That's no good. I've unprotected the page, moved to it Yefimov (because you are right, that's where it belongs), and watchlisted it, in case the vandal hits it again. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 00:28, July 25, 2009 (UTC)
Question regarding your edits on Communist genocide
Hello, PasswordUsername. You have new messages at Anderssl's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Anderssl (talk) 02:21, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
3RR warning report
Sorry, but I find your recent reverts unacceptable therefore I reported you here] for edit warrning.--Jacurek (talk) 05:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- What are you talking about, he self-reverted his last: . It's only 3 reverts in 24h. Offliner (talk) 05:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Estonia
I've noticed that criticism of Estonia's attitude towards nazism (such as the failure to prosecute local nazi war criminals, etc.) tends to get removed from most articles in WP because it allegedly "doesn't belong" in that particular article. So I was thinking, maybe it could be a good idea to create a central article for that kind of stuff. The name could be something like Criticism of Estonia's attitude towards nazism or something (the choice of a name is important, because a bad name could be used as a main argument in an AfD discussion.) I've started working on the outline a bit: User:Offliner/Estonia. This is just a suggestion. What do you think? Offliner (talk) 06:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Dear Offliner, as long as you don't say "ESTONIA" killed Jews, as long as you don't say that Estonians commemorating their Waffen SS who died fighting the Soviets "Nazi glorifiers," et al., please feel free to present factual commentary and make room for factual rebuttal. What you have so far is not objective and not even factual. It is the start of a rant.
- Especially, don't attempt to construct a criticism coatrack contending that criticism of appearances are criticism of fact. That being "Estonian attitudes towards Nazism." What you have so far in no way reflects actual Estonian attitudes either now, during WWII, or before WWII.
- I hope you find this more useful than the inevitable "atta boys" you're going to get from some quarters.
- IMHO, you will not get objective feedback from the owner of this user page, however, that is of course only my personal perception casting no aspersions upon any party here. VЄСRUМВА ♪ 01:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- In the Stalin-era the Fascists meant anything Anti-Soviet (for example western Social democrats who supported parliamentarism). And even today some people believe the Fascists are out there. Peltimikko (talk) 19:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- We don't use the term to designate what Stalin meant by it; we use the term to designate what reliable sources use the term for. (And no, "fascist" never meant "anti-Soviet"). I'd think that Resistance veterans would know what they're talking about. PasswordUsername (talk) 19:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- I tell you a story: Stalin had a sixtieth birthday on 21 December, 1939. This happened during the Winter War. From the outside of the Soviet Union, Stalin received two only congratulations. The first was received from the leader of the Nazi Germany A. Hitler, and the second congratulation was received from the head of the puppet regime Finnish Democratic Republic (founded by Stalin himself), O.W. Kuusinen. Here we have all Fascists we ever need. Peltimikko (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- We don't use the term to designate what Stalin meant by it; we use the term to designate what reliable sources use the term for. (And no, "fascist" never meant "anti-Soviet"). I'd think that Resistance veterans would know what they're talking about. PasswordUsername (talk) 19:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)