Revision as of 21:51, 25 June 2009 edit68.225.240.96 (talk) Merge proposal← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:30, 30 August 2009 edit undoRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 edits Notifying of move discussionNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Merging with 1 E-11/10 s== | ==Merging with 1 E-11/10 s== | ||
Those two articles should be merged with this one. Beyond 1 E-9 s, an article for each digit doesn't have enough information to cover or notability to be by itself. That's why 1 E-15 s and 1 E-18 s cover the two digits below them, and it works fine that way. 1 E-12 s is no different. ] (]) 21:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | Those two articles should be merged with this one. Beyond 1 E-9 s, an article for each digit doesn't have enough information to cover or notability to be by itself. That's why 1 E-15 s and 1 E-18 s cover the two digits below them, and it works fine that way. 1 E-12 s is no different. ] (]) 21:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Move discussion in process== | |||
There is a move discussion in progress on ] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:1 E-18 s crosspost --> —] 11:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:30, 30 August 2009
Time List‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Discrepancy
3.3 picoseconds (approximately) – time taken for light to move 1 millimeter 100 picoseconds – the time required to travel across a human hair, if traveling at the speed of light
Am I the only one that sees a discrepancy here?
'Yes, there is a major discrepancy. A pico second is NOT one millonth of a millionth of a second. It is one thousandth of a nanosecond!!!' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.244.11 (talk) 02:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Isn't a millionth of a millionth the same as a thousandth of a billionth? Doesn't light go a little over an inch in a picosecond? Maybe 30 millimeters? And 100 femtoseconds to cross a human hair. Bob Webster (talk) 03:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Merging with 1 E-11/10 s
Those two articles should be merged with this one. Beyond 1 E-9 s, an article for each digit doesn't have enough information to cover or notability to be by itself. That's why 1 E-15 s and 1 E-18 s cover the two digits below them, and it works fine that way. 1 E-12 s is no different. 68.225.240.96 (talk) 21:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Move discussion in process
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1 E-18 s which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RFC bot 11:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Categories: