| Revision as of 11:29, 6 September 2009 editTlb1000 (talk | contribs)40 edits →The Herald (album)← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:11, 6 September 2009 edit undoRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits →The Herald (album): KeepNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Keep''' Article is factually accurate and representitive of the album recently released <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | *'''Keep''' Article is factually accurate and representitive of the album recently released <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| *'''Do Not Delete''' I personally think the aricle should be left as it is for a while. I have heard of this before and think the article should be left in place. ] (]) 11:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | *'''Do Not Delete''' I personally think the aricle should be left as it is for a while. I have heard of this before and think the article should be left in place. ] (]) 11:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' I agree with Boxcar - ] (]) 12:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:11, 6 September 2009
The Herald (album)
- The Herald (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No ghits or google news results for this apparently highly controversial yet commercially successful album. No appearances in the music review sites that panned it so critically, the second worst reviewed album at metacritic is something called 'Hefty Fine by Bloodhound Gang' and not this album as claimed. Nothing to support the existence of this song, fails WP:V and is quite possibly an outright hoax and written as an attack on or to otherwise disparage Travis Barker. Benea (talk) 07:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. An obvious hoax. –Merqurial (talk) 07:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Hoax, possible speedy per G3. Pmlineditor Talk 09:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Article is factually accurate and representitive of the album recently released —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlb1000 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete I personally think the aricle should be left as it is for a while. I have heard of this before and think the article should be left in place. Boxcar90 (talk) 11:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Boxcar - Ret.Prof (talk) 12:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC)