| Revision as of 19:19, 15 December 2005 editCiriii (talk | contribs)426 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:24, 15 December 2005 edit undoCiriii (talk | contribs)426 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| CIRIII | CIRIII | ||
| Hi and welcome to my user page. i began using Wiki only in summer 2005, and really see the benefets of it...I am very much in favour of a free ] within the public domain and one that can be accessed and added to by everyone with few ]s on ] of speech. When i see someone in a discussion page getting angry over something as it disagrees with their ] (POV) I am a little perturbed that they do not understand the point of wikipedia as a tool for ], and therfore by necessity ]; nothing more. | |||
| Well I Just started editing today...how addictive! I didn't think i would do so much, "am not going to ] much" I though at first, ] alot of discussions, they get my ].....feels like world ] III is erupting alot... That theory has gone out of the window...I am very much in favour of free speech and Wikepedia is exellent therefore. | |||
| I have a ] in ], specialising in ] ] and ] history c]-] ad; any intrigues at the royal court, i'm your man. I consider myself fairly qualified in ] areas too (see Wikepedia:babel) and am quite happy to tranaslate or help with anything i feel i can. I am pretty much an all rounder with lots of stuff...and when i start editing and creating articles, I hope this comes through. | |||
| Am not entirely sure about editing at the mo....But if my first one gets reverted..i was bold!! | |||
| I loathe ] and also articles that, through lack of reading, or over editing, become a ramshackle of nothingness....instead of debating whether or not they should ]!! | |||
Revision as of 20:24, 15 December 2005
CIRIII
Hi and welcome to my user page. i began using Wiki only in summer 2005, and really see the benefets of it...I am very much in favour of a free encyclopaedia within the public domain and one that can be accessed and added to by everyone with few limitations on freedom of speech. When i see someone in a discussion page getting angry over something as it disagrees with their point of view (POV) I am a little perturbed that they do not understand the point of wikipedia as a tool for learning, and therfore by necessity free speech; nothing more.
I have a degree in history, specialising in European political and Royal history c600-1500 ad; any intrigues at the royal court, i'm your man. I consider myself fairly qualified in linguistical areas too (see Wikepedia:babel) and am quite happy to tranaslate or help with anything i feel i can. I am pretty much an all rounder with lots of stuff...and when i start editing and creating articles, I hope this comes through.
I loathe vandalism and also articles that, through lack of reading, or over editing, become a ramshackle of nothingness....instead of debating whether or not they should BE BOLD!!