Misplaced Pages

User talk:Off2riorob: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:45, 22 September 2009 view sourceNinetyone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,591 edits Gordon Brown: cmt← Previous edit Revision as of 19:20, 22 September 2009 view source Ninetyone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,591 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Gordon Brown. (TW)Next edit →
Line 22: Line 22:
:Erm, what? We're talking about a category here, not a template. The sources both state that he has sight only in one eye, making him half blind. Feel free to try to dispute the BBC and the Guardian on the talk page if you wish... ]:] <small>(reply on my talk)</small> 18:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC) :Erm, what? We're talking about a category here, not a template. The sources both state that he has sight only in one eye, making him half blind. Feel free to try to dispute the BBC and the Guardian on the talk page if you wish... ]:] <small>(reply on my talk)</small> 18:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
::See ]. ]:] <small>(reply on my talk)</small> 18:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC) ::See ]. ]:] <small>(reply on my talk)</small> 18:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

== September 2009 ==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:Gordon Brown|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]:] <small>(reply on my talk)</small> 19:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:20, 22 September 2009

Duck Test

Well, it could be a rabbit in disguise !
Hungry?... Have a pizza!

Archives


No archives yet.

yes but i hav backed it up by saying it is backed up in a book by anthony seldobn 12:38, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Georgereev118118 (talk)

can u do it i dont no how to add citations Georgereev118118 (talk) 12:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Uploaded

I uploaded the pic I wanted to at ] how would i go about linking it to the Article? Bishop Castle. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:55, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Gordon Brown

The pretty in depth profile from the Guardian specifically states that "By the end of the second term of his second year Brown was blind in his left eye" (just over half-way down) and the BBC profile says "He eventually lost the sight in one eye" (under the heading "Detached retina"). ninety:one (reply on my talk) 18:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Erm, what? We're talking about a category here, not a template. The sources both state that he has sight only in one eye, making him half blind. Feel free to try to dispute the BBC and the Guardian on the talk page if you wish... ninety:one (reply on my talk) 18:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
See Talk:Gordon_Brown#Category:Half-blind_people. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 18:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gordon Brown. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 19:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)