Misplaced Pages

User talk:DannyMuse: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:20, 15 December 2005 editKonrad West (talk | contribs)1,008 edits →Hello DannyMuse: I really have to protest Missionary.← Previous edit Revision as of 06:10, 16 December 2005 edit undoMissionary (usurped) (talk | contribs)174 edits →Hello DannyMuseNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:


::Tomm's remarks aside, I really have to protest the idea of us vs. them that you express. It's not JWs vs. ex-JWs here. Sure, there are arguments over how things should be wordedn and what should be included, but the concept of WP is to write an encyclopedia, not to present your views, or keep a watch on the view of the "other side". It really would help if this clique mentality was put aside. --] <small>AKA</small> <small>''']'''</small> 23:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC) ::Tomm's remarks aside, I really have to protest the idea of us vs. them that you express. It's not JWs vs. ex-JWs here. Sure, there are arguments over how things should be wordedn and what should be included, but the concept of WP is to write an encyclopedia, not to present your views, or keep a watch on the view of the "other side". It really would help if this clique mentality was put aside. --] <small>AKA</small> <small>''']'''</small> 23:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

:::Konrad, you are ignoring the crux of the matter. It is Tomm&Central making accusations against fellow posters and against JWs that causes the rifts. The JWs don't provocate through any of their statements. Tommtral with condemn the edits and state that is provocation enough, but he/they are so adamant that free dialogue doesn't exist. ] 06:10, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


:Yeah, it's real ingenious to post snide remarks yourself and add like four tags in the two days that you've been here and then complain to a fellow Witness when someone else adds the first one ever in all their months here. By the way, how's that reading of ] coming?] 12:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC) :Yeah, it's real ingenious to post snide remarks yourself and add like four tags in the two days that you've been here and then complain to a fellow Witness when someone else adds the first one ever in all their months here. By the way, how's that reading of ] coming?] 12:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:10, 16 December 2005

Previous discussions on this page have been archived.


Welcome! Please post any comments you may have. --DannyMuse 17:34, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

References & Useful Links

"Registering a free account takes only a few seconds, and has many benefits."

Dispute Resolution

Hello DannyMuse

I'm a longtime Wiki lurker who "converted" so to speak lol, and now I'm here posting on the JW articles. I noticed in the articles you've held your own quite nicely, so I wanted to commend you. We share a common friend who loves snide remarks and tags (names withheld to take the high road haha). Anyways, hope to see you back at the JW pages. Right now it's myself and Tony holding up the fort, would enjoy your assistance as well. Cya. Missionary 11:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Tomm's remarks aside, I really have to protest the idea of us vs. them that you express. It's not JWs vs. ex-JWs here. Sure, there are arguments over how things should be wordedn and what should be included, but the concept of WP is to write an encyclopedia, not to present your views, or keep a watch on the view of the "other side". It really would help if this clique mentality was put aside. --K. AKA Konrad West TALK 23:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Konrad, you are ignoring the crux of the matter. It is Tomm&Central making accusations against fellow posters and against JWs that causes the rifts. The JWs don't provocate through any of their statements. Tommtral with condemn the edits and state that is provocation enough, but he/they are so adamant that free dialogue doesn't exist. Missionary 06:10, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, it's real ingenious to post snide remarks yourself and add like four tags in the two days that you've been here and then complain to a fellow Witness when someone else adds the first one ever in all their months here. By the way, how's that reading of Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks coming?Tommstein 12:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)