| Revision as of 01:57, 18 September 2009 editGu1dry (talk | contribs)5,013 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:29, 1 October 2009 edit undoGu1dry (talk | contribs)5,013 edits blanked | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{lowercase title}} | |||
| {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} | |||
| == Hangon templates == | |||
| Please note that the {{tl|hangon}} template should not be used on articles tagged for ] – only those that have been nominated for ]. The ] is ''not'' nominated for speedy deletion, and so should not have the hangon template. I made a brief note of this in my edit summary . I will now remove the template from the page. Also, please do not type in capital letters – it's the equivalent to shouting. Cheers, ] (]) 17:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: RFCBot Jr. == | |||
| Heh, it seems my edits were quickly overwritten, but I thought life should go on even if the bot was taking a break. When the light goes out, you dig out the candles... Reminds me what a good thing it is to have the bot around for performing the mechanical edits, though :P ] (]) 19:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == September, 2009 == | |||
| ] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages{{#if:|, as you did to ]}}. Your edits appear to constitute ] and have been ]. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 -->--] (]) 18:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Careful == | |||
| Somehow, you left tags on ] stating they were blocked. They are not blocked, and you are unable to block people. I didn't evaluate how bad whatever they did was - merely that you gave them false information on their user talk page. Please don't tell users they are blocked until they actually are blocked. Thanks. ] (]) 19:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Whatever, I thought I could post a block tag on their page & they would be temp blocked until a admin reviewed it. 『 ] 』 <sup>] • ]</sup> 19:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :: ] ] (]) 19:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :: Please don't let Dave and Validbanks dissuade you. You were just not aware of how things worked. Validbanks 34 will be dealt with - if the disruption continues, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. ] (]) 20:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| However, please don't edit war. After he reverted you, you should not re-revert - instead, take discussions to the talk page, regardless of how right you might be. ] (]) 20:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Seriously, you did use the wrong template. I suggest that you bookmark ] and ]. Next time you want to warn a user you will find quickly the correct template. Be sure to escalate correctly, starting with level 1 templates, specially for new users who might not know what rule they are breaking, since the level 1 gives a short explanation and links to relevant pages. --] (]) 20:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I know about ], I just jump a few rungs on the ladder, because it lists the block tags on the page, making think anyone can use them. I didn't not notice the ''Admin use only'', due to my extreme frustration with the situation. I do not need you to patronizing me. I have already spoken to ] about this & I do not wish to speak about the subject anymore. 『 ] 』 <sup>] • ]</sup> 20:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:24 hours|a period of '''24 hours'''|a short time}} for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]{{#if:Mac OS X| at ]}}. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:yes|<font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 23:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)}}</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block --> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I was not edit warring, I was revert vandalism caused by ]|decline=It was not obvious vandalism, so yes, you were edit warring. An edit you disagree with is not vandalism. –''']''' | ] 23:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ]<!-- use ] for YELLOW flag --> | |||
| {{Quote box | |||
| | quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ].''''' | |||
| | source = Thank you. | |||
| | width = 20% | |||
| | align = right | |||
| }} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please ]. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the ]. | |||
| If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to the top of the article ('''just below''' the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines. | |||
| For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn --> ] (]) 20:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC) | |||