Revision as of 05:41, 24 September 2009 editWhisperToMe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users662,740 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:20, 2 October 2009 edit undoWizard191 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,388 editsm Undid revision 315859567 by WhisperToMe (talk) - not a metalworking articleNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Luxembourg}} | {{WikiProject Luxembourg}} | ||
{{WikiProject metalworking}} | |||
{{WikiProject Companies}} | {{WikiProject Companies}} | ||
Revision as of 01:20, 2 October 2009
Luxembourg Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Companies Unassessed | |||||||||||||||||
|
Mittal Steel should not be merged into the article ArcelorMittal for the following reasons: 1. Arcelor has not been merged into ArcelorMittal's article. 2. MittalSteel was a past entity, and it's accomplishments cannot be combined with those of ArcelorMittal's 3. MittalSteel had a different set of directors and executives than ArcelorMittal EVil-Aer (talk) 22:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
I have the same view i.e that Mittal Steel should not be merged into Arcelor Mittal as technically , legally and culturally they are different companies. Even if mittal steel does not exist anymore it does provide a useful antitheses for students and knowledge mongers alike to know what the older company was all about .
clarification of place
"Its industrial presence in Europe, Asia, Africa and America" - which 'America'? The US of America? 'The Americas'? North America?
The first three are continents, so I assume that 'America' is meant to be as well, but you need to specifies which continent or else pluralize it to read 'the Americas'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.65.36 (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Categories: