| Revision as of 13:21, 17 October 2009 editFrania Wisniewska (talk | contribs)6,074 edits →Jean D'Mailly← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:40, 17 October 2009 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 48h) to User talk:Kansas Bear/Archive 1.Next edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| Harassment is defined as a pattern of offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to have the purpose of adversely affecting a targeted person or persons, usually (but not always) for the purpose of threatening or intimidating the primary target. The intended outcome may be to make editing Misplaced Pages unpleasant for the target, to undermine them, to frighten them, or to discourage them from editing entirely. | Harassment is defined as a pattern of offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to have the purpose of adversely affecting a targeted person or persons, usually (but not always) for the purpose of threatening or intimidating the primary target. The intended outcome may be to make editing Misplaced Pages unpleasant for the target, to undermine them, to frighten them, or to discourage them from editing entirely. | ||
| == There is a reason == | |||
| You see: | |||
| Independent Turkic states (in black) | |||
| De facto states (in blue) | |||
| 1. Colors are different. | |||
| 2. One is a link, one is not. If you look at it, you couldn't read it easily because of this difference, your mind is stuck onto it. I have recently written M.S. thesis and my main concern was to hold consistency throughout the thesis. This is the most important thing in academic writing. The quality of the article sucks if you do not use the same rule throughout the article ( for example if there is a link in one heading and there is not a link in second, this is the change of a rule!)] (]) 00:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I see no reason to remove the link. This isn't an academic paper. This is an encyclopedia. Feel free to link "Independent Turkic states" so you can find harmony in this article. --] (]) 04:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Emadam == | == Emadam == | ||
| Line 44: | Line 34: | ||
| Thank you for your suggest . I recently joint to wikipedia , so i don't know well the rules of it . But for what you removed all my writings ? My English grammer is not good and i want you to help me to expand the my historical articles | Thank you for your suggest . I recently joint to wikipedia , so i don't know well the rules of it . But for what you removed all my writings ? My English grammer is not good and i want you to help me to expand the my historical articles | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| Thanks Kansas Bear, I was providing the link for the user to be able to see the actual wording etc. in the source. I'm not quite sure why I have been doing this when normally it isn't done. Your guidance and explanation will be quite useful for my future use. Thanks again. ] (]) 01:31, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| KB: I just fell upon this article: it is a pure fake & should be deleted, don't you think? ''Cordialement,'' ] (]) 01:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC) (FW) | KB: I just fell upon this article: it is a pure fake & should be deleted, don't you think? ''Cordialement,'' ] (]) 01:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC) (FW) | ||
| :I believe it was in the process of being removed. --] (]) 03:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | :I believe it was in the process of being removed. --] (]) 03:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 67: | Line 54: | ||
| == Proposed major reforms to decade articles == | == Proposed major reforms to decade articles == | ||
| Hi - I noticed you have contributed recently to one or more of the decade articles (], ] etc). I am proposing some major changes to these articles, as I have outlined in ], and I would be interested in hearing your views in the first instance. Thanks. ] (]) 09:06, 17 October 2009 (UTC) | Hi - I noticed you have contributed recently to one or more of the decade articles (], ] etc). I am proposing some major changes to these articles, as I have outlined in ], and I would be interested in hearing your views in the first instance. Thanks. ] (]) 09:06, 17 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:40, 17 October 2009
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Misplaced Pages documentation, there's also Misplaced Pages:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fire Star 火星 17:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Possible Interest
Misplaced Pages: Harrassment
Misplaced Pages:Harassment.
Harassment is defined as a pattern of offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to have the purpose of adversely affecting a targeted person or persons, usually (but not always) for the purpose of threatening or intimidating the primary target. The intended outcome may be to make editing Misplaced Pages unpleasant for the target, to undermine them, to frighten them, or to discourage them from editing entirely.
Emadam
Thank you for your suggest . I recently joint to wikipedia , so i don't know well the rules of it . But for what you removed all my writings ? My English grammer is not good and i want you to help me to expand the my historical articles
Jean D'Mailly
KB: I just fell upon this article: it is a pure fake & should be deleted, don't you think? Cordialement, Frania W. (talk) 01:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC) (FW)
- I believe it was in the process of being removed. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it was a coincidence. It seems to me that the article was sending readers to other articles by clicking on blue-linked names, which leads me to believe some other "D'Mailly" individuals may have "wormed" their way into other wiki articles. Frania W. (talk) 13:18, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well, when I stumbled on to the article, it was part of a fake genealogy involving Louis XI. While checking into that, which involved having you translate a piece on Louis XI's mistresses, I realized the information was very interwoven. I believe I found something about Jean d'Mailly briefly mentioned along with Ferry d'Mailly on Leo van de Pas' genealogy site. IIRC, I had asked an Admin to delete these articles, but nothing had come of it. The User:Dragoon1988, using an ANON IP as well, had created about 3 or 4 articles to promote a false genealogy. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Here are two more created by Dragoon1988, --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it was a coincidence. It seems to me that the article was sending readers to other articles by clicking on blue-linked names, which leads me to believe some other "D'Mailly" individuals may have "wormed" their way into other wiki articles. Frania W. (talk) 13:18, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Éléonore de Roucy & Madeleine de Mailly (not Maillé) are real historical figures. Madeleine's papa was Ferry II de Mailly. Find results by asking for Mailly in Éléonore de Roye, Princesse de Condé, 1535-1564, by Jules Delaborde:
page 2: http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/PDF/Bourbon-Conde-Conti.pdf
Bonne lecture! Frania W. (talk) 03:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- I know. This was part of the problem that I was facing. Sifting the fake individuals from the real individuals that simply had false information written into their articles!! Which is why I was trying to keep any false genealogy from being written into the Antoine de Bourbon(Navarre) article. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:38, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- So all that remains is to keep vigilant for fakes planted in the biography of real individuals. Bon weekend! Frania W. (talk) 13:21, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Proposed major reforms to decade articles
Hi - I noticed you have contributed recently to one or more of the decade articles (1990s, 1960s etc). I am proposing some major changes to these articles, as I have outlined in Talk:1990s#Suggested_reform_of_decade_articles, and I would be interested in hearing your views in the first instance. Thanks. Kransky (talk) 09:06, 17 October 2009 (UTC)