Revision as of 13:27, 18 October 2009 editCaptain Occam (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,011 edits →Race and intelligence: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:51, 23 October 2009 edit undoRamdrake (talk | contribs)8,680 edits →3RR: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate your involvement in this article, as well as your participation on its discussion page. Several of the people working on the article just seem interested in pushing their own point of view about it, but thus far you’ve been a lot more reasonable, and having more people like you involved in it helps counteract this problem. I hope you’ll continue to contribute to the current discussions about how the article should be restructured. --] (]) 13:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate your involvement in this article, as well as your participation on its discussion page. Several of the people working on the article just seem interested in pushing their own point of view about it, but thus far you’ve been a lot more reasonable, and having more people like you involved in it helps counteract this problem. I hope you’ll continue to contribute to the current discussions about how the article should be restructured. --] (]) 13:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
== 3RR == | |||
{{3RR|Race and genetics}}--] (]) 15:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:51, 23 October 2009
Race and intelligence
I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate your involvement in this article, as well as your participation on its discussion page. Several of the people working on the article just seem interested in pushing their own point of view about it, but thus far you’ve been a lot more reasonable, and having more people like you involved in it helps counteract this problem. I hope you’ll continue to contribute to the current discussions about how the article should be restructured. --Captain Occam (talk) 13:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
3RR
Your recent editing history at Race and genetics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Ramdrake (talk) 15:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)