Revision as of 17:05, 26 October 2009 edit84.92.117.93 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:39, 26 October 2009 edit undoStation1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers32,626 edits →Requested move: supportNext edit → | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
] → ] — - The only other person listed on the disambiguation page, ], is a stub, and there is no evidence in any of the external links that he is commonly called "Michael Quigley". A hatnote on this article would better direct readers. --] (]) 17:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC) | ] → ] — - The only other person listed on the disambiguation page, ], is a stub, and there is no evidence in any of the external links that he is commonly called "Michael Quigley". A hatnote on this article would better direct readers. --] (]) 17:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''Support'''. With only 2 possibilities whose titles are similar but not identical, there's no need for a dab page. A hatnote on each to the other is all that's needed. ] (]) 18:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:39, 26 October 2009
Illinois Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Chicago Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Biography: Politics and Government Stub‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Would it be possible to add the following:
"Mr. Quigley is a heterosexual, but he has a large number of gay constituents and is supportive of gay causes. Recently, he played hockey in the Gay Games hosted in Chicago."
Is the following sentence really necessary? "Quigley did not receive the endorsements of any organized labor union in the 2006 election." It seems to me that if we apply the endorsement preferences of a special-interest groups (big labor, big business, Greenpeace, N.R.A., Planned Parenthood, etc.) to Quigley, then we should include it for all politicians or Board Commissioners as a matter of consistency.
- I've removed that unsourced sentence per WP:BLP. The article is being hammered with anonymous vandalism today so I've given it semi-protection for a day. —Sean Whitton / 16:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
This guy is a total tool. Let people edit this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.32.91 (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed, 100% —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.43.207.114 (talk) 17:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Alright keep it the way it is —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.32.91 (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Article title?
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was moved to Michael Quigley, and Mike Quigley (footballer) moved to Mike Quigley, hatnotes to be added to disambiguate -- Aervanath (talk) 07:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- If the other Michael Quigley is located at Mike Quigley (footballer), can't the Congressman be located at Michael Quigley and the footballer at Mike Quigley? Qqqqqq (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- I guess they can be. But is it the best solution? I'd like to see some evidence. I can see neither harm nor benefit in the proposal, so I'd leave it as is. Andrewa (talk) 09:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Currently Mike Quigley redirects to Michael Quigley, which is a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Right. If both Mike Quigley and Michael Quigley go to the same place, why not just have one of each go to the politician and the athlete. Seems unnecessary to have a disambig page for this and more straightforward just to have a see-also message at the top of each bio article. Qqqqqq (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
What ever happened on this? I think the footballer got moved, but the politician didn't. I'm not sure what the outcome of the discussion was. Qqqqqq (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
It has been proposed in this section that Mike Quigley be renamed and moved to Michael Quigley. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move |
Michael Quigley (politician) → Michael Quigley — - The only other person listed on the disambiguation page, Mike Quigley, is a stub, and there is no evidence in any of the external links that he is commonly called "Michael Quigley". A hatnote on this article would better direct readers. --84.92.117.93 (talk) 17:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support. With only 2 possibilities whose titles are similar but not identical, there's no need for a dab page. A hatnote on each to the other is all that's needed. Station1 (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Stub-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Illinois articles
- Stub-Class Chicago articles
- Unknown-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- Automatically assessed biography (politics and government) articles
- Automatically assessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Requested moves