Misplaced Pages

User talk:AbdulHornochsmannn: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:05, 28 October 2009 editTiamut (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,614 edits →Welcome← Previous edit Revision as of 23:23, 28 October 2009 edit undoAbdulHornochsmannn (talk | contribs)69 edits →WelcomeNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:
:::This is not math, its about historical narratives, some of which are bound to conflict. :::This is not math, its about historical narratives, some of which are bound to conflict.
:::There is no such thing as ] on Misplaced Pages. There is only what ]'s have to say which can be ]'ed. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC) :::There is no such thing as ] on Misplaced Pages. There is only what ]'s have to say which can be ]'ed. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

::::"Please discuss on the article talk page. Not here."
::::You began a discussion. I responded. I had no idea I was not permitted to respond.
::::"This is not math, its about historical narratives, some of which are bound to conflict."
::::Am I to understand it that the statement "The 22nd Amendment to the Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution limits African Americans to two terms as President" is no more than a mere "conflict of historical narratives"?
::::Is this truly how Misplaced Pages works? As a Black Man, the false racial implications of that statement would be nothing less than a mockery of the TRUE racism suffered by my ancestors. I can only imagine how a Jew must feel when reading such "conflicting narratives". ] (]) 23:23, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:23, 28 October 2009

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, AbdulHornochsmannn, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tiamut 08:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Al-Bassa, before removing or altering sourced information, I would appreciate it very much if you would open a discussion on the talk page first. Bringing new sources to the discussion that contain the information you are seeking to alter would help. Thank you and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Tiamut 08:41, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Is it necessary to discuss a patently false implication? If an article were to state: "The 22nd Amendment to the Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution limits African Americans to two terms as President",ref>Charters of Freedom - The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights</ref> must we open up a discussion before removing the patently misleading reference to African Americans?
Yes, it is true that Palestinian Citizens of Israel lived under martial law during the period mentioned. As did Jewish Israeli Citizens living in the same area. The obvious false implication of the statement is that this state of law applied in a discriminatory way. By all means, as per your request, I will refrain from clarifying even the most biased of implications.
The statement: "One witness to the expulsion said that it was preceded by soldiers shooting and killing five villagers inside the church, while another said seven villagers were brutally shot and killed by soldiers outside the church." is an extremely inaccurate, unnecessarily biased (how was this alleged shooting any more "brutal" than those fired back?) and very possibly untrue. I checked the source, and the author himself provides no source. He merely makes a claim. How is it that what originated as an absolutely unsourced claim mysteriously transformed itself into a statement of fact?
I have every intention of abiding by Misplaced Pages's editing protocols. Please explain to me the proper manner of correcting obvious errors, intentional or not, the the guidelines you've supplied are simply of no help.
In it's simplest sense, should an article state: 1+1=3, am I free to replace the 3 with a 2? AbdulHornochsmannn (talk) 19:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

AbdulHornochsmannn (talk) 19:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Please discuss on the article talk page. Not here.
This is not math, its about historical narratives, some of which are bound to conflict.
There is no such thing as WP:TRUTH on Misplaced Pages. There is only what WP:RS's have to say which can be WP:V'ed. Tiamut 20:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
"Please discuss on the article talk page. Not here."
You began a discussion. I responded. I had no idea I was not permitted to respond.
"This is not math, its about historical narratives, some of which are bound to conflict."
Am I to understand it that the statement "The 22nd Amendment to the Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution limits African Americans to two terms as President" is no more than a mere "conflict of historical narratives"?
Is this truly how Misplaced Pages works? As a Black Man, the false racial implications of that statement would be nothing less than a mockery of the TRUE racism suffered by my ancestors. I can only imagine how a Jew must feel when reading such "conflicting narratives". AbdulHornochsmannn (talk) 23:23, 28 October 2009 (UTC)