Revision as of 04:18, 22 December 2005 editRbj (talk | contribs)3,805 edits my the hell problem, R, is that you're deaf. (either that or a close-minded egotistical arrogant jerk.) which would you prefer to be thought of as?← Previous edit |
Revision as of 04:41, 22 December 2005 edit undoRchamberlain (talk | contribs)2,341 edits you must be delusional because i've never even interacted with you.Next edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{User:Sam Spade/Welcome}} |
|
|
|
|
|
==Vandalism== |
|
|
{{test3}}--] | ] 21:07, 29 May 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Libel == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please research what is and isn't libel before claiming that article is libel. Theres also something in US law where the name escapes me right now, fair something-or-other, that allows criticism like that, hence the legality of ] and other such sites. --] 21:13, 29 May 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
:And you seem not to know how the law is applied, plus you also do not know how things work on here, such as contesting content and put sigs on your post either. --] | ] 21:20, 29 May 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== . == |
|
|
|
|
|
Damn, I thought Misplaced Pages was supposed to be a free, open content encyclopedia. Never knew it was ran like the Stalinist regime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Remainder Mark== |
|
|
|
|
|
Please '''don't blank''' your discussion page, it's not polite. Also see if the subject You are writing about exists already i.e.] . -] 21:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Nice edits== |
|
|
|
|
|
Nice edits to ]! Thank you, ]] 01:23, 30 July 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== dun dun dun == |
|
|
|
|
|
dun |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hi == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please avoid refering to other user's well-intentioned contributions as "stupid". Even if they are. Things really work better without users exchanging insults. See you. ] 01:34, July 21, 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Minuteman Project== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. I noticed that you recently copied the contents of this article into a new article ] and redirected the orginal. Unfortunately, by doing it this way we will lose the history of the page. Instead, if this page needs to be renamed, it should be moved. Please see ], for details of how to move it. Cheers ] 10:12, 3 August 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
*I also added the link, which you put in the new article, into the original article. Cheers ] 10:24, 3 August 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Vandalism== |
|
|
If you do edits like , you will be blocked. ] 15:08, 12 December 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== please be more careful with your editing. == |
|
|
|
|
|
i had to revert some of them. why would you go through so much effort to ''ambiguate'' a concept? |
|
|
|
|
|
also, please learn to use the '''Show preview''' button. this is not your own word processor where you hit the "Save" function after every other keystroke so you don't lose your work (in case the computer crashes). it really craps up the history of a WP article to save every little change, when you're making several or many changes. please edit thoughtfully, then hit '''Show preview''', if there are corrections to make or other edits, make them, then hit '''Show preview''' again and repeat this process until you're satisfied with what you have. hit '''Save page''' only if there were ''no edits'' made to the page since the last '''Show preview'''. ] 18:52, 19 December 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== i was trying to be polite == |
|
|
|
|
|
listen, would you rather just hear that you're a shitty editor? that you have no motivation here but to grind your axe using WP as the stone? that your phobia of the '''Show preview''' button (or laziness to use it) is direct evidence that you are anything but a thoughtful editor? your edits are shit. your behavior has attracted attention to your account and now there are dozens of editors that are watching to revert everything you type. why not improve your behavior (and attitude, that might be nice) instead of beginning a revert conflict with a dozen different editors and getting the attention of admins? |
|
|
|
|
|
clean up your act, will ya? ] 03:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC) |
|