| Revision as of 22:28, 3 November 2009 editTdinoahfan (talk | contribs)107 edits rvv← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:29, 3 November 2009 edit undoOnorem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,755 edits →Nothing false about the warning you removed: I am.Next edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Please stop. Your edit to ] is not helpful or appropriate. --]]] 22:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | Please stop. Your edit to ] is not helpful or appropriate. --]]] 22:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| um wow pay attention inteased of just reverting anything | um wow pay attention inteased of just reverting anything {{unsigned|Tdinoahfan}} | ||
| :I am paying attention. Your edit was not appropriate. Your upset about your article being deleted. That's fine. Calling people stupid is not acceptable, and ignoring that, the edit was completely out of place. --]]] 22:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:29, 3 November 2009
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/TDA Aftermath
I have gone ahead and closed Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/TDA Aftermath as what is technically a speedy keep, since nobody favors deleting TDA Aftermath. Hopefully, anything useful from the page has already been salvaged and merged in. —C.Fred (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Ed, Edd, n Eddy's Big Picture Show
Given that it's been through a full AfD you'll need to take this to WP:Deletion review - and you may want to check out civility too. Skier Dude (talk) 20:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- The absence of reliable sources is also problematic. If there were sources to back up the release of the movie, I would back creation of a new article and, were it speedy deleted, vote to overturn in a deletion review. However, the last article created had no reliable sources listed. —C.Fred (talk) 20:46, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Please provide sources that the film exists and I'll happily stop suggesting it for speedy. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoLo dicono a Signa. 21:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:49, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
ANI
FYI - please have a look at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ed.2C_Edd.2C_n.27_Eddy.27s_Big_Picture_Show. If you can provide sources to show that the program exists, I see no reason to speedy. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoLo dicono a Signa. 21:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- It was speedied because it's already been deleted at AfD and is thus a WP:CSD#G4 speedy. To restore it, the user will need to go to deletion review. In addition, edit-warring and then messing with the WP:ANI thread is really not a good idea. Black Kite 22:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Please see it. Don't remove the section. It will be archived automatically 24 hours after the last comment left in the section. Protonk (talk) 22:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Nothing false about the warning you removed
Please stop. Your edit to Misplaced Pages:Deletion review is not helpful or appropriate. --Onorem♠Dil 22:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
um wow pay attention inteased of just reverting anything — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tdinoahfan (talk • contribs)
- I am paying attention. Your edit was not appropriate. Your upset about your article being deleted. That's fine. Calling people stupid is not acceptable, and ignoring that, the edit was completely out of place. --Onorem♠Dil 22:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC)