| Revision as of 23:11, 3 November 2009 editTdinoahfan (talk | contribs)107 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:29, 3 November 2009 edit undoTdinoahfan (talk | contribs)107 edits ←Replaced content with '{{unblock|i have no reason to be blocked. nobody was explaining to me what i was doign wrong and instead were harassing me and claiming i was vandalizing .nobod...'Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{unblock|i have no reason to be blocked. nobody was explaining to me what i was doign wrong and instead were harassing me and claiming i was vandalizing .nobodya ttempted to provide help. }} | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/TDA Aftermath == | |||
| I have gone ahead and closed ] as what is technically a ], since nobody favors deleting ]. Hopefully, anything useful from the page has already been salvaged and merged in. —''']''' (]) 19:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Given that it's been through a full AfD you'll need to take this to ] - and you may want to check out ] too. ] (]) 20:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :The absence of ] is also problematic. If there were sources to back up the release of the movie, I would back creation of a new article and, were it speedy deleted, vote to overturn in a deletion review. However, the last article created had no reliable sources listed. —''']''' (]) 20:46, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please provide sources that the film exists and I'll happily stop suggesting it for speedy. --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 21:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| ] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion{{#if:|, such as on ]}}, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 21:49, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==ANI== | |||
| FYI - please have a look at ]. If you can ''provide'' sources to show that the program exists, I see no reason to speedy. --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 21:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| * It was speedied because it's already been deleted at AfD and is thus a ] speedy. To restore it, the user will need to go to ]. In addition, edit-warring and then messing with the ] thread is ''really not a good idea''. <b>]</b> 22:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *Please '''see''' it. Don't remove the section. It will be archived automatically 24 hours after the last comment left in the section. ] (]) 22:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Nothing false about the warning you removed == | |||
| Please stop. Your edit to ] is not helpful or appropriate. --]]] 22:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| um wow pay attention inteased of just reverting anything {{unsigned|Tdinoahfan}} | |||
| :I am paying attention. Your edit was not appropriate. Your upset about your article being deleted. That's fine. Calling people stupid is not acceptable, and ignoring that, the edit was completely out of place. --]]] 22:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you're interested in settling down, I'd be willing to try to help you format your request at deletion review. What you are doing now will not get you any closer to seeing the article restored. --]]] 22:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR Warning == | |||
| Please also be aware that you may be in breach of the ] 3 revert rule. ] (]) 22:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| it says an exception is revrting VANDALISM.. which i am doing | |||
| == November 2009 == | |||
| ] '''This is your last warning'''. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]. <!-- Template:uw-huggle4 --> ] (]) 22:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| * Yes - last warning. You are causing disruption. If you wish to appeal the deletion of the article at deletion review, then go to ], READ ] and edit properly. If you disrupt any more pages you will be blocked. <b>]</b> 22:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''] indefinitely''' from editing for {{#if:incivility, edit-warring.|'''incivility, edit-warring. See ]'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:<b>]</b> 22:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)|<b>]</b> 22:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 --> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=i was rveerting vandalism! i was trying to report it then i got unfairly blocked!|decline=I think sufficiently demonstrates that you do not grasp the requirement to be ] on Misplaced Pages. —''']''' (]) 22:48, 3 November 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| :No, you were re-adding vandalism that multiple other editors had removed. You were also edit warring. ] (]) 22:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| BULL! that was NOT vandalism! iw as told to take it there and idk why but it looks like part of it got cropped off and then i guess those editors hate the show so they wanted to sotp me by vandalizing the page and i was trying to stop them!!! | |||
| : was '''committing''' vandalism, not removal of vandalism. At no time, in any of your edits on the DRV page, did you follow the directions for opening a case. As a result, your edits were deemed to be disruptive. —''']''' (]) 22:43, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| WELL SORRY FOR NOT BEING A FUCKING WIKIPEDIA EXPERT HOW ABOUT YOU {{rpa}} ACTUALLY HELP ME INSTEAD OF JUST VANDALISING <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| * If you read the section above, I did actually explain how to raise an issue at deletion review. Instead, you kept on posting abusive comments on the page. I'm not entirely sure what else we are supposed to do in that situation. <b>]</b> 22:46, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| YOU DIRECT THE BLCOK TO THE ACTUAL VANDALS!!! AND NOY OU DID NOT! | |||
| AND ITS PRETTY FUCIMNG HARD TO BE "CIVIL"W HEN I WAS BLOCKED FOR NO REASON! | |||
| *I tried to be helpful as well. All I asked was that you provide a source, any source, to show that the program was notable, and I would have happily stopped tagging for speedy. --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 22:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| its a damn movie! how is it not notable? | |||
| *I would suggest casting an eye over ]. That should give you some idea of how to ''prove'' notability, should you want to recreate the article. --<font face="Old English Text MT">]</font><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 23:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Further, I requested a reliable source to ] the movie. Notability and verifiability are twin pillars, interrelated but not the same. —''']''' (]) 23:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| IT WAS RELEASED <FONT SIZE=10>SIX</FONT> MONTHS AGO! IF THAT ISNT VERIFIED IN YOUR EYES THEN YOU MUST BE ON DRUGS~! | |||
Revision as of 23:29, 3 November 2009
Tdinoahfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i have no reason to be blocked. nobody was explaining to me what i was doign wrong and instead were harassing me and claiming i was vandalizing .nobodya ttempted to provide help.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=i have no reason to be blocked. nobody was explaining to me what i was doign wrong and instead were harassing me and claiming i was vandalizing .nobodya ttempted to provide help. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=i have no reason to be blocked. nobody was explaining to me what i was doign wrong and instead were harassing me and claiming i was vandalizing .nobodya ttempted to provide help. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=i have no reason to be blocked. nobody was explaining to me what i was doign wrong and instead were harassing me and claiming i was vandalizing .nobodya ttempted to provide help. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}