| Revision as of 21:08, 6 November 2009 editRjd0060 (talk | contribs)33,499 edits Reverted to revision 323686606 by Rjd0060; feel free to rephrase that one if you'd like a response from me.← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:32, 12 November 2009 edit undoEdwardsBot (talk | contribs)354,693 edits →Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| ]] ] 15:29, 31 October 2009 (UTC) | ]] ] 15:29, 31 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop == | |||
| As you participated in the recent ] election, or in one of two ] that relate to the use of ] for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the ]. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.<br/> | |||
| <br/> | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, <br/> | |||
| ] (]) 08:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0005 --> | |||
Revision as of 08:32, 12 November 2009
I will usually reply to messages left here on this page so check back for a response.
 Archives
|
Close to Home (Song)
Can you move Close to Home (Song) to User:Sheled Umlal/Close to Home so that I may work on it? —Preceding undated comment added 19:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC).
Eric Violette
This article is one you salted a little over a year ago -- would you consider removing the protection? (The subject is the guy who plays the pirate in the FreeCreditReport.com commercials.) I'm not sure about notability -- it's a singing pirate, after all -- but since the article was salted (and since the last deletion review) there have been reliable sources reporting on the subject. (See ). It may be worth opening it up to see if anyone writes a usable article.
My primary concern is that if we leave something salted that long, a subject that was not notable under the guidelines can become notable -- but we won't get an article about it because rank and file editors won't be interested in navigating deletion review or unprotection. Unless we really need to leave this salted to avoid disruption, I think we should try to open it up to see whether the subject has become notable. Thoughts? --TheOtherBob 16:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. --TheOtherBob 21:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Check mail. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Hylden Lord
I noticed you deleted this along with Hash'ak'gik which redirected there. I am not sure what these originally looked like, but while it probably did not deserve an individual article since it was not the main character of these games, they could both redirect too List of Legacy of Kain characters#Hash'ak'gik which describes the guy. Would it be okay to restore these and change them to redirect there? Also I am wondering, whatever content was originally at this article, would it be possible to find an archive to see if any could be incorporated and merged into his description on the LoK character list page? Sarafan Lord, Hylden General & Dark Entity are other terms for the same character which I hope can also be directed there, since they were not previously deleted I figure they might be recent additions. Tyciol (talk) 00:38, 23 October 2009 (UTC) .
Warning
Please do not revert edits that aren't vandalism. RMHED 00:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
If you're busy, don't bother looking, it's really just a "thankyou"
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 15:29, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop
As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)