Revision as of 17:26, 12 November 2009 editEnigmaman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers41,744 edits →Alerts← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:27, 12 November 2009 edit undoAstronaut (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,192 edits →User-reportedNext edit → | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
*{{IPvandal|59.50.33.2}} - vandalism after final warning. This is an anonymous IP edit following the pattern of the already blocked Petepanning sock. Here is a diff: that matches Petepanning's: The sock evidence is here: ]. ] (]) 17:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC) | *{{IPvandal|59.50.33.2}} - vandalism after final warning. This is an anonymous IP edit following the pattern of the already blocked Petepanning sock. Here is a diff: that matches Petepanning's: The sock evidence is here: ]. ] (]) 17:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
:{{AIV|ns}} ]<sup>]</sup> 17:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC) | :{{AIV|ns}} ]<sup>]</sup> 17:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
* {{IPvandal|88.78.233.119}} This is the second time I have flagged ] and ] for speedy deletion under db-r3, and I noticed that both redirects have been deleted several times before. I think it is the same IP creating these redirects (only the talk page is created, nothing in the main article space), so can something be done about it - perhaps ] both pages? ] (]) 17:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:27, 12 November 2009
Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 19:24 on 9 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Alerts
Bot-reported
User-reported
- 1222tiffany1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - On Dog dna breed identification; vandalism after final warning. Copyright infringement after level 4im warning: Warning: , copyvio edit: , "mea culpa" note timestamped 2 minutes later: . KuyaBriBri 15:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Blocks are preventative, not intended to be used as punishment. The offending article has been deleted and they haven't edited again. There's no reason for further administrative action at this point. Daniel Case (talk) 15:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hyperkid500 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Last warning issued but it's a forgone conclusion. treelo radda 16:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hasn't edited since final warning.--Tikiwont (talk) 17:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Madness3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - . Named Bambifan101 sock. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- 163.153.100.92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) 16:55, 12 November 2009 (hist | diff) John Stuart Mill (←Replaced content with 'john stweart mills was a enlish revoklutionary who worked ver hard for womens rights and was bunz.') (Tag: blanking) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilly granger (talk • contribs)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. –Juliancolton | 17:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- 59.50.33.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - vandalism after final warning. This is an anonymous IP edit following the pattern of the already blocked Petepanning sock. Here is a diff: that matches Petepanning's: The sock evidence is here: Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Petepanning/Archive. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Enigma 17:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- 88.78.233.119 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) This is the second time I have flagged Talk:Schlampe and Talk:Vergewaltigung for speedy deletion under db-r3, and I noticed that both redirects have been deleted several times before. I think it is the same IP creating these redirects (only the talk page is created, nothing in the main article space), so can something be done about it - perhaps WP:SALT both pages? Astronaut (talk) 17:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)