Misplaced Pages

User talk:Off2riorob: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:11, 29 November 2009 view sourceSW3 5DL (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers21,544 edits editing links← Previous edit Revision as of 03:55, 29 November 2009 view source Georgewilliamherbert (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,680 edits Possible collusion with Redheylin to harrass Cirt: new sectionNext edit →
Line 101: Line 101:
::::::Yeah, good deal. Will help carry the water on anything you need as well. I hear ya on the energy thing. I want to add a few things I think the bio needs, but other pages hold great interest for me too.] (]) 22:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC) ::::::Yeah, good deal. Will help carry the water on anything you need as well. I hear ya on the energy thing. I want to add a few things I think the bio needs, but other pages hold great interest for me too.] (]) 22:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Love the sudden quiet. Here ya go, ] (]) 01:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC) :::::::Love the sudden quiet. Here ya go, ] (]) 01:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

== Possible collusion with Redheylin to harrass Cirt ==

Your exhange on Redheylin's talk page, and their subsequent ANI report regarding Cirt, makes it look like the two of you collaborated to harrass Cirt in some way. It's not clear from what happened on wiki that anything untoward actually occurred, but the behavior is suspicious enough for me to ask if you'd like to comment and clarify the situation in the ANI thread.

Thanks. ] (]) 03:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:55, 29 November 2009

Duck Test

Well, it could be a rabbit in disguise !
Hungry?... Have a pizza!

Archives


No archives yet.



where ya at?

What's going on?Malke 2010 (talk) 02:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey Rob, saw the ANI thing and I asked Child of Midnight about it because I noticed the edit links were closed but I couldn't see the outcome or maybe I just didn't know where to look. I saw the comments, but you had a couple of defenders, too. I'm sure the admins are well familiar with the guys throwing fire bombs. And hey, you came out really well, no block. On the religion thing, the BLP is a good idea. Karl Rove seems to spend a lot of time there! Take care, and have a happy Thanksgiving if you are in the States.Malke 2010 (talk) 16:02, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

please see my page again

Jandrews23jandrews23 (talk) 09:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Cheers....

can't stand all these "it was revealed"s and similar tabloid editorial-style innuendos! Leaky Caldron 20:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

LOL! I've seen your rants in other places - N.I., Scotland, EDL. There are some very partisan editors at work! Leaky Caldron 21:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Rob. I've done for now. Got rid of the separate controversy section. Please review when you have time. Leaky Caldron 22:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
and yet less than 200 bytes diference. Let's see if it sticks. What's that saying..."you can fool some of the people some of the time..." LOL. It's just about sensible, less biased adjectives. Now for Scotland and N.I.....! Leaky Caldron 22:18, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
agreed. There was a real battle over at EDL with Verbal. Scotland, NI and such like are really problematic. Single word changes can take weeks. I just stick to the talkpages. I've been helping to keep the instinctive terrorist theorists at bay over at Fort Hood. Leaky Caldron 22:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

You keep deleting correct information that I am adding.

Camilla Kerslake is a classical singer, with an album released and so I do not understand why the wikipedia page I created for her must be deleted.

Also, I keep adding information to Gary Barlow's page that is correct and it is being deleted. I also notice that there is incorrect information on this page that I tried to edit but then my edit was deleted.

Why?

HeartsMarkee (talk) 16:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

I have declined this speedy. Notability is asserted, and a quick Google News search shows multiple articles in national publications. I'm a little concerned that this is a case of biting a newbie. Oldelpaso (talk) 17:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
The subject does not look notable to me, there are no citations, perhaps a news event, as I see they are attempting to become notable, feel free to add come citations and content.Off2riorob (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Its more the fact that it was tagged as a speedy at all. If an article makes any plausible assertion of notability, then it is not suitable for speedy deletion and should not be tagged as such – take it to AFD if you wish. I'd never heard of this singer before, but the article indicates that she is signed to a major, asserting notability, and a quick Google showed that the information given checks out. I'll put a note on the creator's talk page to say that it hasn't been speedied and give a couple of pointers about how to cite, perhaps he/she will want to add more. Oldelpaso (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

...

What do you mean by 'uncited material'? I didn't add his children's dates of birth, that was there before! I added CORRECT information about when he and his wife met, rather than the currently incorrect information that is there, and listed further details about his charity efforts. That is all correct information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HeartsMarkee (talkcontribs) 17:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Boone

Hi there. You probably don't need my third opinion on the content because the IP you're dealing with is most likely banned user HarveyCarter. I believe it's the same range he/she uses and it's the same MO, that's for sure. He/she has an obsession with people's sexuality and basically just adds a sentence or two claiming the subject has engaged in some type of homosexual encounter at some point. They almost never provide a source (if they do, they conveniently leave out page numbers so verification is impossible) and their reasoning is almost always "this is well known" or some other excuse. My advise is just revert, ignore and ask for semi-protection when the edit warring gets out of hand. Their circular arguments and edit warring will only serve to give you a headache. Anyhow, I've left a note on the talk page of the Boone article giving my opinion. I'll also watchlist the article and revert any of the IPs edits. He'll probably move on once he's been discovered, but he'll attempt to add the content back in about a month or two. Pinkadelica 17:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. I see you pretty much already figured it out. Cheers! Pinkadelica 17:56, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Where can I find the instructions for how to write articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MoodFreak (talkcontribs) 18:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Is there a correct way to use the edit summary box? MoodFreak (talk) 18:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC) Nevermind, I see I can click on the link beside the box, sorry. MoodFreak (talk) 18:47, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Off2riorob. You have new messages at Talk:Robert_Garside.
Message added 14:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aditya Ex Machina 14:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Yup, I read through that discussion. I'm waiting for Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs) 's input on this. Aditya Ex Machina 14:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Dear Mr/Ms.Off2riorob

FIrst of all I deeply appreciated you to concern my creating page "Jung-Hack Seo". I am struggling to create it. Database was not clearly constructed yet. I will do my best. Occasionally please help me to finish this note up.

  1. REDIRECT --I S2009 (talk) 17:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hope you have checked all my today's contribs and are watching. Redheylin (talk) 19:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

No email - unless you really need? Redheylin (talk) 19:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Cannot see how to do that..... Redheylin (talk) 20:06, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, can not see that. Redheylin (talk) 20:33, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

done.Redheylin (talk) 20:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Weekend

Hey Off2riorob. Thanks for the note. I hope you're enjoying your weekend and that your editing experiences have been more edifying of late. I was reviewing the BLP/N and it looks like you've done a lot of good work there. I'm glad you didn't let the frustrations get you down. Enjoy the winter, have fun and take care. Oh and thanks for the help with the photos. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:20, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

editing links

Hi Rob, nice to know you are around. Yes, links must be edited.Malke 2010 (talk) 20:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Aye, Lad, are ya Scottish? I love Scotland. Been there several times on vacation. Okay, on the external links thing, in the past I've clicked on links that go nowhere or they go to silly sites like something called, Ten Monkeys. No kidding, somebody actually tried to pass this off as a legitimate reference for something KR did or didn't do. Here's a picture of some heather. I thought you'd appreciate a little heather being a Scotsman, and all. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
That is much more like it. Off2riorob (talk) 21:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
There's one link that goes to a CNN page that was put up by them for the 2004 presidential election. Of course when you go there now, the CNN election coverage page is there but the content is not. Are you saying we can restore the content or do we have to scrub (lose) the link?Malke 2010 (talk) 21:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Understand. Will start checking. Also, any interest in adding new content to KR?Malke 2010 (talk) 22:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, good deal. Will help carry the water on anything you need as well. I hear ya on the energy thing. I want to add a few things I think the bio needs, but other pages hold great interest for me too.Malke 2010 (talk) 22:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Love the sudden quiet. Here ya go, Malke 2010 (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Possible collusion with Redheylin to harrass Cirt

Your exhange on Redheylin's talk page, and their subsequent ANI report regarding Cirt, makes it look like the two of you collaborated to harrass Cirt in some way. It's not clear from what happened on wiki that anything untoward actually occurred, but the behavior is suspicious enough for me to ask if you'd like to comment and clarify the situation in the ANI thread.

Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)