Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:30, 1 December 2009

Film: Filmmaking Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

	Stagecraft (inactive)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stagecraft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.StagecraftWikipedia:WikiProject StagecraftTemplate:WikiProject StagecraftStagecraft

In my theater experience, another characteristic of gaff is that it is easy to rip along one direction, which is really useful for pulling off quick strips. Anybody else? --Chinasaur 06:04, May 17, 2004 (UTC)

Yup, it's easy to cut a half-width strip and it magically splits in half. I added it to the article. Binba 23:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The big difference between gaffer and duct tape, in my experience, is that gaffer is heat resistant - if you put duct tape on lighting equipement it has a bad habit of melting and catching fire. --203.98.13.114 04:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Then you should be using electrical tape. Duct tape was designed for use with heating ducts, which also get hot, and that helps the glue stick better, but that kind of lighting generates much more heat, which will obviously melt it.

Hey, that's good. Find a way to work that in. I don't have much experience with US-style "duct tape", so the more differentiation that can be worked in, the better, I say. --Myk 16:24, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

The tape is commonly referred to within the British military as 'black and nasty'.

That piece of information would probably be more suited to Duct Tape. I don't know about other editors, but I think that this page is best restricted to theatre/cinema usage. --Myk 00:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

But it's the same stuff!

Are you sure this is the same kind of tape? Gaff tape isn't so nasty... Binba 23:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Home Depot

If you are looking for this in a home improvement store, asking for 'gaffer tape' will get you strange looks. (3M) Electrician's Bundling Tape/Electrician's Duct Tape is what you need. -HiFiGuy 22:50, 9 March 2006 (UTC) (speaking from experience)

No. That tape has a plastic base to it. Gaff tape is fabric backed. kmccoy (talk) 23:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Yup... but they don't sell it. In your local megahomestore, EBT/EDT comes close. -HiFiGuy 05:47, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Can't buy it at Home Depot. Ask a lighting company. In the US, Barzibon is good.

In Australia, home improvement centres know what gaff tape is. Have a look at some Australian duct tape--Myk 07:07, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Pressures sensitive

The article says "strong cotton cloth pressure-sensitive adhesive tape". What pressure sensitivity does this tape have? 89.240.60.214 21:13, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

A lot of tape is pressure sensitive. A pressure sensitive adhesive doesn't stick until it is pressed down. Compare to a contact adhesive which sticks on contact.--66.102.196.36 (talk) 05:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Use by Live Sound Engineers

In my experience with live sound, gaff tape is hardly ever put on a console as it does leave some residue. The small amount of residue is fine for cables but you don't want any of that stuff on your $40,000+ console. I think that the comment in this article about that is off, artists tape is the most commonly used tape to label a console. White gaff tape is used if nothing else is available, but it is not extensively used for sure. Anybody else want to comment before I remove that section of the article?--PM - PhilyG 04:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I've only used masking tape and artist's tape. 71.102.122.130 03:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I accommodated this in a new edit. Binba 23:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

McGyver

Nothing about McGyver using it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HTMLCODER.exe (talk • contribs) 08:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

is this necessary?

"Gaffer's tape is often referred to as a production expendable because it is discarded after the production process is complete."

Is it really necessary to say that? It's like saying "gift wrapping celophane tape is often discarded after gifts are opened..." or "After the fight, the tape that is removed from the boxer's hands is discarded..."

Of course we throw the stuff away when we're done with it. Why is it necessary to state the obvious? All adhesive material is discarded when it is used. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.23.23 (talk) 03:02, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Gaffa tape sources

I've reverted the addition of four weak sources for the "gaffa" spelling - three were news items where the word was mentioned as part of a quote, and one was a mention of a cabaret act called Gronja the Gaffa Tape Girl. We need a source that specifically mentions the alternate spelling, rather than just using it in passing; these sources are indistinguishable from three typos and a copyright-avoiding stage act. --McGeddon (talk) 15:18, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Gaffa tape is a common term used in theater work. Gaffa tape is referred to several times in the book Stage management:The Essential Handbook http://www.amazon.com/Stage-Management-Essential-Handbook-New/dp/1854597345 and Feminist Theatre Practice:A Handbook http://www.amazon.com/Feminist-Theatre-Practice-Elaine-Aston/dp/0415139244/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpi_3. Are those good enough for you? I can get the page numbers. How about Oxford? - http://www.tabsareforflying.co.uk/venues/oreilly-theatre-keble/. Or a website of theater terms - http://www.stagespecs.com/pub_process/glossary_search.cfm?letter=G. I doubt all these places just spell the word wrong. - Josette (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree that they were weak in one sense, however all those sources had to do was show that the spelling 'gaffa' tape is used - which they clearly did, (what with using it, and all). They were not intended to show the notability of the alternative spelling - that's not necessary. It may well have originated with a misspelling, but I have bought gaffer tape branded as "Gaffa" - there are a couple of examples here of people marketing it under that name.

Google books provides numerous examples - surely not all typos - of this spelling; also available in German; "Mit Gaffa-Tape kann man auch Auto-Sitzpolster oder zerrissene Jeans flicken". Quite. .   pablo_hablo. 16:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

An actual product label seems best; either that or someone specifically mentioning that "gaffa" is a common spelling in their particular industry or country. We should just be careful to avoid giving prominence to a very obscure spelling that only a few journalists or authors are making as a typo or misapprehension - Googling a typo is always going to turn up a few results, even in newspapers. --McGeddon (talk) 16:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Actual product labels, eh? As well as the ones I posted above, which it seems you may have overlooked, there are some more images here and here. Unless the labelling company made a typo.   pablo_hablo. 16:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

I can hardly believe we have to go to this extent to prove something so obvious. Especially considering the references that are being used in the article now. Here is another - . Plus where is the citation that proves it is ever called gaff tape or is that just a given? - Josette (talk) 16:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Note that all three newspaper sources are from countries where "gaffer" and "gaffa" would be pronounced exactly the same way, so that a reporter who heard the term for the first time would not know how to spell it, and might easily guess wrong. And we all know how often typos make it through newspapers' alleged "proof-reading". So I don't think they are reliable sources. As for product labels, they might be a good source if and only if they refer to the generic product that way. Use of "Gaffa" as a brand name would be evidence against it being a legitimate spelling. -- Zsero (talk) 00:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Pablo, Jack and I have all found acceptable references for for the term gaffa - a very common theater term, references as good as the article has now or better and I will add at least one for gaff - which is more of a slang term but used often. Thanks for all the hard work everybody. I notice you make no comment on the other refs we list.... - Josette (talk) 01:31, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

None of Jack's sources are even close to acceptable. Pablo's are a mixed bag; the German source is of course completely irrelevant, but the product labels do tend to support the existence of this spelling. Though I have in my fridge right now a tub of what its label calls "chic peas"; would you accept it as a source supporting a claim that this is a valid alternative spelling?! I haven't checked your sources yet, but at a glance they do seem to be the sort of sources that would be valid; they certainly seem to be a cut above those provided by Jack and Pablo.

One note about all these sources: they nearly all seem to be from the UK, where such a misspelling can be expected to be common; the question then becomes at what point does a misspelling become so common that it becomes a valid alternative? It would seem to me that such evidence should be sought in UK dictionaries. As of 1998, "gaffa" was not to be found in the Chambers Dictionary™; give that whatever weight you think appropriate, but please do consider it. Certainly if someone has a later edition and says it's there, or finds it in some other reliable (i.e. not wiki-type) dictionary, that would be a great source. -- Zsero (talk) 02:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Just so know, the term gaffa is more common in the UK, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. I'll use the books as references. I also liked the Stage Specs website which used both terms as did one of the refs supplied by Jack. Thanks - Josette (talk) 02:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Again, all of those are places where such a misspelling can be expected, since it sounds exactly the same as the correct spelling; therefore on one hand sources from those places should be treated a bit more cautiously, while on the other hand such a misspelling can spread enough in those places to become a legitimate regional variant. IMHO the place to look for evidence of that is in respected dictionaries of regional English, e.g. Chambers for the UK or Macquarie for Australia. I reported earlier about the 1998 edition of the Chambers; I can't find my Macquarie, which in any case is also from the '90s. -- Zsero (talk) 03:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Reliable sources have now been added - I'm not sure I see it the same as you. I doubt you would find the word 'gaff' in any dictionary yet I found a good reference for the word. If you do find the word gaffer in a dictionary - it probably refers to a person not the tape. I think I have done as you asked and was really quite cautious and diligent in my search for reliable references. I know someone who might have a copy of Macquarie. I will ask them to look up the word. That's about all the more I can do. Thanks again. - Josette (talk) 03:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

A dictionary should have both senses. -- Zsero (talk) 04:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

What happened, here? I offered 'Common UK usage; the original, really' when I first restored the bit about 'gaffa tape' being one of the names for this type of tape. I posted a Google link when I put it back after being reverted. That link gives me 236,000 hits which is very good indication that this term is in common usage. This should have been the end of it. A few more Google queries using quotation marks should clarify the ambient usage of these terms online.

All this article is asserting about these terms is that they are all used and a cursory search supports my initial claim. Handily, this article links to Gaffer (filmmaking), although it does not cite a source for the assertion that this is, in fact, what this tape is named for. Curiously, that article refers to the origin of the word 'Gaffer' as being British. The English language has just tons of words that originate in that part of the works; see England. If this article were attempting to make more specific claims about the etymology of these term, I would expect more robust sources to be cited.

The article goes on to assert that:

Chris Martin of the band Coldplay is known to wear this on his fingers during performances. Also Stewart Copeland of the band The Police used Gaffer-tape to protect his fingers during studio recordings, pictured on the backside of "Zenyatta Mondatta".

These assertions may be true; they may not be. Who's to know? They are uncited. And more important, they are trivial, and I don't see them as appropriate to mention in the article, true or not.

Pablo says that he has significant experience with this tape. Me, too. I've worked as a lighting electrician, as a lighting designer, as the technical director. I was also in management. I've probably used a thousand rolls of the stuff. Gaffer tape and Gaffer's tape are more formal terms and Gaff and Gaffa tape are both very, very, common idiomatic usages. We have easily twenty sources floating about and some of them may offer other tidbits that could be incorporated into the article beyond the insipid issue at hand. Can we move on, please?

@Jo;) we do have the definition at wikt:gaff, several of which seem applicable here; this whole sideshow was a bit of typical wiki-silliness and if it goes on much more people are going to need a gaff to get the trout off the side of their head.

See also

wikt:gaffa

Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

No issues - I removed the trivia ;) - Josette (talk) 14:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

OED

I cut the numerous sources back to one source, the OED. Anyone wishing to discuss is first pointed to WP:RS. It's best to use as few sources as possible, and to use as reliable a source as possible. Since the OED lists "gaffa tape", I hope your edit war can now cease. Hiding T 13:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure the OED does cover this cromulent term, but...

Sign in

The Oxford English Dictionary Online is a subscription service. Access to the Dictionary is only available to users with valid licences.

Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

The OED is available in most major bookshops, and anyone with a library card in the UK can access the online version. We don't prevent people using print sources simply because someone else can't access it, do we? Hiding T 13:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Again no issues - as long as the common terms stay. - Josette (talk) 14:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm fine with it being there; I was fine with omitting such a trivial cite. I was more irked at their business model. DYK... that you can make a wallet out of gaffa? ... that gaffa can prevent fire exit lights from ruining blackouts? ... that gaffa can be used to tie people to trees?

Cheers, Jack Merridew 14:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

You're covering exit lights that are ruining blackouts? Man, you're opening your show to injury and death, and yourself to lawsuit. Binksternet (talk) 15:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Not me, but it is done ;) Cheers, Jack Merridew 16:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Binksternet, I almost went looking for you to see if you wanted to help sort this dilemma but it seems to be sorted for now. - Josette (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

...but what about the trees? ;) Jack Merridew 19:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Gaff tape sources

re the above section: this usage is similarly unsourced and should be removed. I have used Gaffer tape regularly for much of my working life both in professional and domestic situations. After all, it has a dark side and a light side, and holds the universe together. But I have never purchased it under the brand name of, or heard it referred to as, "Gaff tape".  pablo_hablo. 21:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

I didn't challenge "gaff" for one reason: it is clearly distinguishable by ear from "gaffer", so if someone heard it called that it would be reasonable for them to put it in the article. The basis of my challenge to "gaffa" is that I think people who spell it that way are the same people who routinely just rite down whateva sounds rite. -- Zsero (talk) 01:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Here is one book that refers to gaff tape - Careers in Technical Theater see page 97 it is mentioned more than once in the book and there are other sources too. - Josette (talk) 01:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

• Start-Class film articles
• Start-Class filmmaking articles
• Filmmaking task force articles
• WikiProject Film articles