| Revision as of 01:33, 6 December 2009 edit69.132.202.95 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:33, 6 December 2009 edit undo69.132.202.95 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| None of the refs given mention Byrne, some refs may never have existed in the first place. Looks like the same vandal using ], ], ], and ]. -- ] (]), 2009-12-05t12:03z | None of the refs given mention Byrne, some refs may never have existed in the first place. Looks like the same vandal using ], ], ], and ]. -- ] (]), 2009-12-05t12:03z | ||
| Jeandre: I'm not so sure you can tie all of these addresses together into a consipricy. I think you were wrong to just blow away all of the edits you did today. Granted, they were not all correctly sourced but given the very long time spanning each update and the multiple IP addresses, I don't think this can be labeled as normal vandalism. I'm looking a little deeper to see if there is a better explaination. | Jeandre: I'm not so sure you can tie all of these addresses together into a consipricy. I think you were wrong to just blow away all of the edits you did today. Granted, they were not all correctly sourced but given the very long time spanning each update and the multiple IP addresses, I don't think this can be labeled as normal vandalism. I'm looking a little deeper to see if there is a better explaination. --] (]) 01:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:33, 6 December 2009
Jonathan Byrne libel vandalism.
None of the refs given mention Byrne, some refs may never have existed in the first place. Looks like the same vandal using 38.106.143.248, 67.105.2.130, 71.218.125.196, and 71.212.174.130. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-12-05t12:03z
Jeandre: I'm not so sure you can tie all of these addresses together into a consipricy. I think you were wrong to just blow away all of the edits you did today. Granted, they were not all correctly sourced but given the very long time spanning each update and the multiple IP addresses, I don't think this can be labeled as normal vandalism. I'm looking a little deeper to see if there is a better explaination. --69.132.202.95 (talk) 01:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)